Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 23:29:03 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <vag7mv$22tfc$2@dont-email.me>
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <98212c666b602cbacf2476fc4341c29a@www.novabbs.com>
 <17ee5fade60d851b$504666$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <b50bb10aa2dd5727a1bf8ff9bf88a049@www.novabbs.com>
 <17ee716d7c7bfd12$441950$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <5ac85e6c9332ca0bece0023f17f2f442@www.novabbs.com>
 <17ee8ec58ffd13c8$485658$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <c519bd5f0f4086da711ede104860ed8e@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eeb977c7724ff7$459327$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <694f454547a8e56961b6896086a119f8@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eede9524f9dfa3$533525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <916be12c0817f8d3d361d8265d8c57d5@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eefed3289d061e$484574$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com>
 <17ef02dd9f274dac$613242$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vag5lm$22tfc$1@dont-email.me>
 <17ef14dd74c304ba$550814$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 23:29:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7801f336f702aca5f177fe01780d0c8d";
	logging-data="2192876"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+s8PL4iFrU1mIQKCbnV+/Y"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v15WxA1MrDXsUyRCCsUm7vZ+ArI=
In-Reply-To: <17ef14dd74c304ba$550814$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2520

Le 25/08/2024 à 23:08, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 25.08.2024 o 22:54, Python pisze:
>> Le 25/08/2024 à 17:38, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> ...
>>> So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
>>> of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
>>> an absurd lie, trash?
>>
>> Some part of physics may need a definition of second,
>> some other parts don't. Relativity (or Newtonian physics)
>> doesn't.
> 
> If you're  asserting, it must be true...

Feel free to check by yourself.