Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?4oCcd2hv4oCdIG9yIOKAnHfigJ0/?=
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:23:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <vaiv9b$2kocn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:23:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="546aa385814575b64d15f1d40accd158";
	logging-data="2777495"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18fzt2frk+DPif/3yzLUMJN"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+ksj+96WYO6ggmJLgFGMjD/iYpU=
Bytes: 1202

This article on “6 Linux security commands every new user should know”
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/6-linux-security-commands-every-new-user-should-know/>
includes the “who” command to list logged-on users, but not “w”.

What I have found, having used both, is that “w” is more informative.

Which one do you prefer?