Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental Blockage
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 15:39:04 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vakhd8$302qs$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me> <liduroFtbroU2@mid.individual.net> <vah9hs$2c43u$1@dont-email.me> <lj56luFe0luU3@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:39:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6a6718b96d66ed796c4d0a5c1defadb7";
	logging-data="3148636"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/X5R+sInaspBQKhYnxBqR5"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:p90ewTzrkRINV9n5xfEHbE0+YR8=
Bytes: 1783

On 2024-08-27 05:32:16 +0000, Thomas Heger said:

> Am Montag000026, 26.08.2024 um 09:06 schrieb Mikko:
> ...
>>> Relativity requires mutally symmetric methods. So if you synchronize 
>>> clock B with clock A, this must come to the same result, as if you 
>>> would synchronize clock A with clock B.
>> 
>> No, it does not mutually symmetric methods. Such methods make the
>> presentation of the theory easier but do not affect the theory.
>> Einstein chose a symmetric method because otherwise his text would
>> be harder to read and understand.
> 
> The very word 'relativity' requires mutually symmetric perspectives.

Not in any context where that word is not used.

-- 
Mikko