Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vakofe$315ad$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: New SETI search
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 09:39:42 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vakofe$315ad$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vaj062$2kr3d$1@dont-email.me>
 <menqcj1270ta8rjtmasodqi5nkier8rnhl@4ax.com> <vaju6r$2sv5c$2@dont-email.me>
 <vakhlm$30112$1@dont-email.me> <dikrcjt3115dmeaog758mll3mth67o2ask@4ax.com>
Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="57856"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DxsfLBEddLOckeChh0TCAaXiGHA=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id 00ACD22986F; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:39:44 -0400 (EDT)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB93222978C
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:39:42 -0400 (EDT)
	id 09518872B4; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:39:46 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
	by mod-relay.zaccari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0ED07FC26
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:39:45 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mod-relay.zaccari.net D0ED07FC26
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C225F84A
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:39:42 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/E3C225F84A; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
	id A8463DC01A9; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 16:39:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-Injection-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 16:39:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+wZDS/dTRn1DY6y2UE5NFgatNTJJ4xpVY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <dikrcjt3115dmeaog758mll3mth67o2ask@4ax.com>
	FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 4315

On 8/27/2024 8:27 AM, El Kabong wrote:
> RonO wrote:
>> On 8/27/2024 2:11 AM, Ernest Major wrote:
>>> On 27/08/2024 06:24, El Kabong wrote:
>>>> Previous searches at Aricebo and other sites looked for
>>>> alien signals at 1420 Mhz.  They picked that frequency
>>>> because it is a hydrogen line.  The thinking is that
>>>> aliens would more likely broadcast there than an
>>>> arbitrary frequency.  It never made sense to me because
>>>> the signal will be attenuated by any hydrogen lying in
>>>> the path, and because if you tune in to the hydrogen
>>>> line, you'll find... hydrogen noise!
>>>
>>> The argument is that the 1420 MHz line is less arbitrary, and is not
>>> absorbed by interstellar dust.
> 
> Any radio signal is less absorbed by dust than optical
> wavelengths.
> 
> 1420 was probably a good pick, but it does have that
> drawback.
> 
>> If the aliens had broadcast at 1420 MHz what would be the frequency that
>> we would detect in an expanding universe?  I realize that some galaxies
>> are moving towards us, but the red shift indicates that most things are
>> getting further away from us in all directions due to the Big Bang.
> 
> Any radio signal we receive will be redshifted.  But we
> are not looking for extragalactic signals, they would be
> way too faint.  We are looking for something here in our
> own neighborhood of the Milky Way, around 10k lightyears
> max.  At that distance the redshift is measurable but
> unimportant, even for a narrow-band receiver.

This example is looking at other galaxies.

Ron Okimoto
>