| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vamcpn$3c4ke$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: New VSI post on Youtube Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 05:32:40 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 10 Message-ID: <vamcpn$3c4ke$2@dont-email.me> References: <vadndu$1igfq$1@dont-email.me> <memo.20240827134054.19028g@jgd.cix.co.uk> <valhi8$34s18$4@dont-email.me> <valonj$3614m$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 07:32:40 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="52d1e1001450c2fe7f8121ab25cdb228"; logging-data="3543694"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+kkIHdhw6ZD9y2XENEblHP" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TpSZMNsJ1/3NC3FajvgcYRcJFjg= On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 19:50:10 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > But more important then I don't think pages in spec is a good indicator > for language complexity. Some languages like to specify things very > precise in great detail. Other languages like to produce something that > is readable. Unless you can point out examples in my comparison of the Python and Java specs where this makes a significant difference, I will stick to my claims about their relative complexity.