Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 10:00:39 -0400
Organization: Peripheral Visions
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <vanaic$3ge7i$1@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <h6Deptvp2nWZ7A-WxxE_8LCEIYY@jntp> <8d5b0145-b30d-44d2-b4ff-b01976f7ca66@att.net> <WtY45o_2xWeSk0s5VFpkO7OO7b0@jntp> <bd225e98-2fa5-49d5-806e-f25e2c8f24da@att.net> <MyfajwdXdoZZDQyGfKtmPKpt08o@jntp> <6cc86827-def3-4948-9e69-a3fea9e86c06@att.net> <vagheo$24vpo$4@dont-email.me> <6SLKsYqqtl1spoN6trAGFCEcAxc@jntp> <valbld$33pko$1@dont-email.me> <CvvV1cSfPC3QJ3tElnVntHhM_ZE@jntp>
Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:00:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="379831b470fbec1a43a5e1a123102f2a";
	logging-data="3684594"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ORgsSBqE2qAMoTojNBt2Aocmu/IXVdOA="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VOdR9+xX+NYWM8y3p30uRNplNXI=
X-ICQ: 1701145376
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
Bytes: 1876

WM presented the following explanation :
> Le 27/08/2024 à 22:07, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
>> On 8/27/2024 12:36 PM, WM wrote:
>
>>> Dark natural numbers are larger than any visible natural number but 
>>> smaller than their bound omega.
>>> Dark unit fractions are smaller than any visible unit fractions but larger 
>>> than their bound 0.
>> 
>> Define visible?
>
> The simplest definition is this: A visible number can be expressed in 
> decimals or binaries.

Can be? Or is? Or has previously been?