Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 18:55:14 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <vanrqi$3j3mt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <VbrzO.74199$NSs5.15950@fx17.iad>
 <memo.20240828191727.19028q@jgd.cix.co.uk>
 <w%JzO.33560$95o8.18523@fx09.iad>
Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 20:55:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6791420e7bb3486bbf20e4d49a6cf7b8";
	logging-data="3772125"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2enT6w5bKMoCdbMQ2RXcv9+8V3NnoUCQ="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RHLpgBFsi7cyJxx9seJYRpuM+54=
Bytes: 1236

Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> schrieb:

> The problem with this is that RISC-V isn't currently comparable,
> feature-wise, with ARMv8.0.    To compete with Neoverse-N2 cores,
> they'll need to support a similar feature set - most of which doesn't
> exist in the RISC-V design space yet.

What is missing (in broad terms)?