Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 12:02:35 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <vaqgkb$2r8p$6@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <WtY45o_2xWeSk0s5VFpkO7OO7b0@jntp>
 <bd225e98-2fa5-49d5-806e-f25e2c8f24da@att.net>
 <MyfajwdXdoZZDQyGfKtmPKpt08o@jntp>
 <6cc86827-def3-4948-9e69-a3fea9e86c06@att.net> <vagheo$24vpo$4@dont-email.me>
 <6SLKsYqqtl1spoN6trAGFCEcAxc@jntp> <valbld$33pko$1@dont-email.me>
 <CvvV1cSfPC3QJ3tElnVntHhM_ZE@jntp> <vanaic$3ge7i$1@dont-email.me>
 <nTstM2rqnAPVLSM935ZrojNuyoY@jntp> <vaq693$1fks$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 21:02:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="98c6004928f46df0abe90729ccf8af51";
	logging-data="93465"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/v39axf2xu4nO94fGsUisen9Jkm+fLBDU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uj82VMQwHngIj/9WF89dj86rysY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vaq693$1fks$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2592

On 8/29/2024 9:05 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
> WM formulated the question :
>> Le 28/08/2024 à 16:00, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>>> WM presented the following explanation :
>>>> Le 27/08/2024 à 22:07, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
>>>>> On 8/27/2024 12:36 PM, WM wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Dark natural numbers are larger than any visible natural number 
>>>>>> but smaller than their bound omega.
>>>>>> Dark unit fractions are smaller than any visible unit fractions 
>>>>>> but larger than their bound 0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Define visible?
>>>>
>>>> The simplest definition is this: A visible number can be expressed 
>>>> in decimals or binaries.
>>>
>>> Can be? Or is? Or has previously been?
>>
>> Is or has previously been. If not yet expressed in the system, it is 
>> dark in the system. But small dark numbers can become visisble. (They 
>> have been called grey numbers.)
> 
> Oh no! Grey numbers? You're pulling my leg now huh? How would you 
> distinguish a small enough dark or grey number from a fully dark larger 
> number?

WRT floating point RGB say (0, 0, 0) is dark, or the color black. I 
guess a gray one would be (.01, .01, .01) ? lol.