Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Artificiqal Intelligence
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 11:03:24 -0800
Lines: 99
Message-ID: <varvoj152a99f5i8clcrsvec6a65hv6jjl@4ax.com>
References: <vm96ae$33q5f$1@dont-email.me> <j3tgojdugu8f0vfvdqfn0qdjcvussa60cf@4ax.com> <IMTiP.163222$5c34.692@fx47.iad> <vmh3p1$14atd$1@dont-email.me> <PpWiP.552557$FOb4.427947@fx15.iad> <nc0pojlf17utjion0vo8mjqts606t48oam@4ax.com> <GRfjP.74454$G93a.59447@fx05.iad> <vmk60v$2kbc6$2@dont-email.me> <aevjP.662397$FOb4.284849@fx15.iad> <vmm1pi$3a9ho$2@dont-email.me> <vmm4nn$395fk$2@dont-email.me> <t3atoj5gp6b6eprskvjfld7g86hm36di7b@4ax.com> <vmoaio$4khq$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net Bx2A9nHbxLdIKGHhS9GJ6Ac4i7AWo6dJzCOWlZb2A8W4ZHWBFn
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kFJnHeRghGv2DOADb7zvv+d6pVs= sha256:t6p04qLMNU2/tPn0TYi6WP6pR4BZrS6PqRSGTiYk8Hw=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Bytes: 4896

On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:22:16 -0500, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On 1/20/2025 2:55 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:30:14 -0500, zen cycle
>> <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> On 1/20/2025 10:55 AM, cyclintom wrote:
>>>>> On Sun Jan 19 18:39:57 2025 AMuzi  wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/19/2025 5:25 PM, cyclintom wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat Jan 18 20:46:38 2025 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:02:07 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat Jan 18 14:43:14 2025 AMuzi  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Or by vector pattern matching:
>>>>>>>>>> https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4350704
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would have a real problem using Chinese security measures.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I guess "would have" means you're not currently having a problem.  If
>>>>>>>> it's not a "real problem", what other type of problem might you have?
>>>>>>>> An un-real problem perhaps?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You bought a phone made in Korea.  How about a Korean company with R&D
>>>>>>>> in Arizona?
>>>>>>>> <https://integratedbiometrics.com>
>>>>>>>> They're also FBI certified.
>>>>>>>> "Certified Products List"
>>>>>>>> <https://fbibiospecs.fbi.gov/certifications-1/cpl>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And yet again - page not found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both links pop right up for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Then ask yourself why my BitDefender blocks them. BitDefender is the
>>>>> best protection on the market.
>>>
>>> Hey dumbass. If BitDefender was blocking them it would tell you it was
>>> blocking them then give you to option to bypass the block. It wouldn't
>>> say "file not found".
>> 
>> If BitOffender was looking a web page on the internet, it would say
>> "404 Site No Found" or something similar.  Web pages and documents are
>> quite different.
>
>that's nitpicking. 

Well, yes.  It's a minor detail but one which is a good indication
that what Tom allegedly saw on the screen is quite different from what
Tom claimed he saw.  I should probably install BitOffender on one of
my machines and see what it actually produced when a site or web page
is blocked.
"How to stop "Suspicious connection blocked" notifications'
<https://www.bitdefender.com/consumer/support/answer/2471/>

>Whether his browser displays "file not found", "page 
>not found", "site not found", "page/site/file/ not available" or 
>whatever ever message would indicate the the link doesn't direct to the 
>intended file, website, or page, is completely irrelevant.

Not completely irrelevant, but sufficient to demonstrate that Tom was
probably lying (as usual).

>If 
>BitDefender was blocking them it would tell him it was blocking them 
>then give him to option to bypass the block. It wouldn't say "[whatever] 
>not found".

Yep.  It seems to be quite good at providing instructions on what to
do next.  I don't use BitDefender, so I'm not familiar with the
procedure.

>> 
>>> IOW, you're simply fucking up as usual.
>> 
>> Close.  I think he's lying (as usual).  Somehow, I'm being accused of
>> posting a link that Tom cannot view, or maybe tampering with the web
>> site, or maybe even tampering with his computer.  Those are not going
>> to happen.  For example, if I post:
>> <https://www.google.com>
>> Tom would likely claim that he can't find Google.  Anyway, I'm not
>> worried because I don't think there's anyone reading rec.bicycles.tech
>> that believes anything that Tom writes.
>
>+1
>

-- 
Jeff Liebermann                 jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272      http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann      AE6KS    831-336-2558