Article <vas7rr$e2la$4@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vas7rr$e2la$4@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<vas7rr$e2la$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental
 Blockage
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:45:15 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <vas7rr$e2la$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me> <liduroFtbroU2@mid.individual.net>
 <vah9hs$2c43u$1@dont-email.me> <lj56luFe0luU3@mid.individual.net>
 <M4vxPZKxPU6U7NDCGNWCGCM0lRc@jntp> <ljahm9F9dfdU2@mid.individual.net>
 <vapd5l$3tffr$1@dont-email.me> <ljd51mFl74gU4@mid.individual.net>
 <vas655$e2la$2@dont-email.me> <o63FO6ufY9csAokzvXMpjto87yU@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:45:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f01e2221d99b21c0754b16fe041d7c3a";
	logging-data="461482"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19jm6odAd82sIQS7y8x9t+U"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cxbTedc8mVVtzLdNQllt0xHVgc0=
In-Reply-To: <o63FO6ufY9csAokzvXMpjto87yU@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1993

Le 30/08/2024 à 12:38, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
> Le 30/08/2024 à 12:16, Python a écrit :
>> I.1.
>>
>> Paragraph I.1. describes a procedure that looks non symmetric at
>> first sight: clocks A and B are not treated exactly the same way
>> (two measures for A, one for B for instance), nevertheless at the
>> end of the day one can *prove* that the results are symmetric and
>> that inverting A and B would lead to the same result.
> 
> Your thing looks like Scientology.
> It's not by constantly repeating the same blunder that it becomes a truth.

This is hard mathematical facts Richard. Something beyond your head.

> [snip nonsense]