Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:01:41 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <vasfrl$7oen$2@i2pn2.org>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <db885c7c1e1a5bfdf60e90fa9882bfb73b4e6ce7@i2pn2.org>
 <eY2Memk56jLKsrTeR3kBDQQqfHI@jntp>
 <bdfbb725-7fc3-4e17-b09b-4d6191d301a5@att.net>
 <tvUGDEKZBjBIOn4R0HIJvG5es4k@jntp>
 <d921df64d59a0bcdd17b4df10452e1b80df52a63@i2pn2.org>
 <bzKSpxSf9uNp5CqHyyYXjN1qFJg@jntp>
 <eca2fc989ec057bba94c874e86af6e33d8987f89@i2pn2.org>
 <dbDJOjuZlR22ACs9b5j_GQZcXac@jntp> <vaqg0e$2r8p$3@dont-email.me>
 <b2vtJ9qNt-ZZ4HcdVjYZeX0tOnI@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:01:41 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="254423"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <b2vtJ9qNt-ZZ4HcdVjYZeX0tOnI@jntp>
Bytes: 1945
Lines: 25

On 8/30/24 8:55 AM, WM wrote:
> Le 29/08/2024 à 20:51, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
>> On 8/29/2024 6:27 AM, WM wrote:
>>> Le 29/08/2024 à 01:48, Richard Damon a écrit :
> 
>>>> You just can't count them from the "end" that doesn't have an end.
>>>
>>> Why not?
>>
>> Because it does not have an end.
> 
> 0 lies below the end. Hence there is an end, even if you cannot see it.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 
> 

No, there does not need to be an "end" for an infinite sequence in that 
sequence.

0 is not "below" the end, but IS the end for the unit fractions, as we 
can get as close to it as we want with a unit fraction.

A sequence whose end is not in the sequence doesn't have an end in the 
sequence.