Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD emulated by HHH --- (does not refer to prior posts)
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 10:59:06 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vasq8b$i9nc$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vajdta$2qe9s$1@dont-email.me> <vak3a0$2teq9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vakhnf$302rl$2@dont-email.me> <vampgq$3dl83$3@dont-email.me>
 <van46p$3f6c0$6@dont-email.me> <van671$3fgd3$4@dont-email.me>
 <van6um$3foem$4@dont-email.me> <vandsl$3grf3$3@dont-email.me>
 <vaneq4$3h3es$1@dont-email.me> <vani7u$3hh2l$1@dont-email.me>
 <vaniq2$3hnvu$1@dont-email.me> <vanjd0$3hh2l$3@dont-email.me>
 <vank65$3htts$1@dont-email.me>
 <1055ba7a1450658831b250bccda8af887bdc6c8a@i2pn2.org>
 <vanut1$3jhrk$1@dont-email.me>
 <0e31140fcbcbfc262e34d122cedde84577c02738@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 17:59:07 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0bcb2e8a964ef5ab37c2a5858ba7d4a2";
	logging-data="599788"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18nBI/baK4UgMxUBFci4+RL"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xU4Gm9ulYSzMKJ8QdXC1YrSLAZY=
In-Reply-To: <0e31140fcbcbfc262e34d122cedde84577c02738@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4102

On 8/30/2024 10:00 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Wed, 28 Aug 2024 14:47:45 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 8/28/2024 2:21 PM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Wed, 28 Aug 2024 11:44:53 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 8/28/2024 11:31 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 28.aug.2024 om 18:21 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> On 8/28/2024 11:11 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>> Op 28.aug.2024 om 17:13 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>> On 8/28/2024 9:57 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Op 28.aug.2024 om 14:59 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/2024 7:46 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Op 28.aug.2024 om 14:12 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/2024 4:09 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 27.aug.2024 om 14:44 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/2024 3:38 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 27.aug.2024 om 04:33 schreef olcott:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When we assume that:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (a) HHH is an x86 emulator that is in the same memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space as DDD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (b) HHH emulates DDD according to the semantics of the x86
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then we can see that DDD emulated by HHH cannot possibly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get past its own machine address 0000217a.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, we see. In fact DDD is not needed at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>> When 100% of the whole point is for HHH to correctly determine
>>>>>>>>>>>> whether or not DDD would stop running if not aborted *IT IS
>>>>>>>>>>>> RIDICULOUSLY STUPID TO SAY THAT DDD IS NOT NEEDED*
>>> Like Fred has been saying for a month, what is HHH(HHH)?
> ^
> 
>>>>>>>>>>> When without DDD it is clear as crystal that HHH cannot
>>>>>>>>>>> possibly simulate itself correctly:
>>>>>>>>> You may repeat it many more times, but HHH violated the semantics
>>>>>>>>> of the x86 language by skipping the last few instructions of a
>>>>>>>>> halting program. This finite string, when given for direct
>>>>>>>>> execution, shows a halting behaviour. This is the proof what the
>>>>>>>>> semantics of the x86 language means for this finite string: a
>>>>>>>>> halting program.
>>> It is very telling to see where these exchanges peter out (haha).
>> A dishonest dodge way form the subject of DDD emulated by HHH.
> To the subject of what?
> 

DDD emulated by HHH
DDD emulated by HHH
DDD emulated by HHH
DDD emulated by HHH
DDD emulated by HHH

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer