Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vasvg2$j3u2$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Top 10 most common hard skills listed on resumes...
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:28:33 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <vasvg2$j3u2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vab101$3er$1@reader1.panix.com> <vafim7$1ubg8$1@dont-email.me>
 <vah4hr$2b9i8$5@dont-email.me> <vahngt$2dtm9$1@dont-email.me>
 <87r0abzcsj.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vai1ec$2fns2$1@dont-email.me>
 <874j75zftu.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <valrj7$367a8$2@dont-email.me>
 <87mskwy9t1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vanq4h$3iieb$1@dont-email.me>
 <875xrkxlgo.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vapitn$3u1ub$1@dont-email.me>
 <87o75bwlp8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vaps06$3vg8l$1@dont-email.me>
 <871q27weeh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829083200.195@kylheku.com>
 <87v7zjuyd8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829084851.962@kylheku.com>
 <87mskvuxe9.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vaqefq$2arg$2@dont-email.me>
 <87h6b3uejz.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87bk1buduc.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 19:28:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="327552fe7460a6412520ee5cb533b0a4";
	logging-data="626626"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19RE4NOt9Hm18Y+mhv7hhhGPZY/eKb9Jo0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HbEeRhQMAmU5XAr0d8TAw3HlTRA=
In-Reply-To: <87bk1buduc.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2068

On 8/29/24 19:08, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
....
> Actually I don't think I did.  I said "reject" and a compiler that says
> "this is not C" and then generates a executable is rejecting the code as
> far as I am concerned.

How about a compiler that says: "Congratulations on using our extension
to C - program accepted"? Such a compiler could be fully conforming, and
I see no way to describe that as a rejection.