Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:40:39 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <vat77n$k5je$4@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <MyfajwdXdoZZDQyGfKtmPKpt08o@jntp>
 <6cc86827-def3-4948-9e69-a3fea9e86c06@att.net> <vagheo$24vpo$4@dont-email.me>
 <6SLKsYqqtl1spoN6trAGFCEcAxc@jntp> <valbld$33pko$1@dont-email.me>
 <CvvV1cSfPC3QJ3tElnVntHhM_ZE@jntp> <vanaic$3ge7i$1@dont-email.me>
 <nTstM2rqnAPVLSM935ZrojNuyoY@jntp>
 <1373928244f778869985cb9264d778bed5ccf85a@i2pn2.org>
 <zfhqECAXJARe3hbRnJ_oaYyjkro@jntp>
 <6f5032e3d9655c7bfde244bddd9a69b2dcbd36b5@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 21:40:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="52205d2e02d95465ac4101a55f1e89ed";
	logging-data="661102"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8eTnKyh/9AEHT+XWyAEBtlFcq0bw9Odk="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CKFPkGZEE80Q7VODr5PJKPXydTQ=
In-Reply-To: <6f5032e3d9655c7bfde244bddd9a69b2dcbd36b5@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2956

On 8/30/2024 6:20 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/30/24 9:01 AM, WM wrote:
>> Le 30/08/2024 à 09:21, joes a écrit :
>>> Am Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:34:14 +0000 schrieb WM:
>>>> Le 28/08/2024 à 16:00, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>>>>> WM presented the following explanation :
>>>>>> Le 27/08/2024 à 22:07, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
>>>>>>> On 8/27/2024 12:36 PM, WM wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dark natural numbers are larger than any visible natural number but
>>>>>>>> smaller than their bound omega.
>>>>>>>> Dark unit fractions are smaller than any visible unit fractions but
>>>>>>>> larger than their bound 0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Define visible?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The simplest definition is this: A visible number can be expressed in
>>>>>> decimals or binaries.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can be? Or is? Or has previously been?
>>>>
>>>> Is or has previously been. If not yet expressed in the system, it is
>>>> dark in the system. But small dark numbers can become visisble. (They
>>>> have been called grey numbers.)
>>> By induction that goes for every number.
>>
>> *If actual infinity exists*, then induction fails to reach most numbers.
>>
>> Regards, WM
>>
>>
> Only in YOUR BROKEN finite logic.
> 
> The problem is all in your head, which got blown up when your logic 
> system exploded in the inconsistancies of you using finite logic on 
> infinite sets.

For some reason I can see WM laughing because he knows better and loves 
the art of the troll. Yikes! Jokes on us?