Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vatepo$l9ks$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Unit fractions... Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:49:44 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <vatepo$l9ks$1@dont-email.me> References: <vaohb6$3li18$2@dont-email.me> <vaojl0$3li18$4@dont-email.me> <vapid1$3uanr$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 23:49:45 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="52205d2e02d95465ac4101a55f1e89ed"; logging-data="698012"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qhwSPLldJq0JPNaQKKIDajnMCHEjwPSg=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:uqw+QsIUj7JJ8PUfHTnK4NDnyKo= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vapid1$3uanr$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2283 On 8/29/2024 3:26 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: > After serious thinking Chris M. Thomasson wrote : >> On 8/28/2024 6:02 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> Just a little plot I did for Moebius and WM using unit fractions on >>> any line in n-ary space. 3d here... >>> >>> https://i.ibb.co/9n71tZf/ct-pov.png >>> >>> https://i.ibb.co/0hXnPpf/ct-pov.png >>> >> >> Wrt WM. Are his dark numbers, say plotting unit fractions on a line. >> Okay. Well, they will never hit zero even though they tend to zero. >> So, are WM's dark numbers the residue between 0 and any unit fraction, >> so to speak? So, 1/0 is not a unit fraction but >> 1/(really_large_natural_number) is? Still finite but I was wondering >> about the dark parts? > > They are in his imagination only. He simply "wants" them to exist so > that he can use them to refute Cantor's diagonal argument about |Q| = > |N|. He thinks numbers must be identified in order to pair them to show > a bijection. He also thinks that failing to show a bijection means that > there is no bijection. Some more experiments just for fun: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/Acx98dhJjkV6QBPX/