Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vatmeh$mhl0$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Python (was Re: I did not inhale) Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 00:00:17 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: <vatmeh$mhl0$4@dont-email.me> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <v9m4gd$14scu$1@dont-email.me> <20240815182717.189@kylheku.com> <v9npls$1fjus$1@dont-email.me> <v9t204$2dofg$1@dont-email.me> <va28pi$3dldm$1@dont-email.me> <va2ro9$3gd7v$1@dont-email.me> <va2vt0$3h3gj$1@dont-email.me> <va44rh$3p1l6$1@dont-email.me> <va45eq$3pkt9$1@dont-email.me> <va4aut$3q4g0$1@dont-email.me> <va4fbr$3qvij$1@dont-email.me> <va5108$3tmmd$1@dont-email.me> <va51ok$3tqr9$1@dont-email.me> <va5ec2$3vluh$1@dont-email.me> <va6q4g$c1a7$1@dont-email.me> <va6rpa$c6bg$1@dont-email.me> <va6se9$cb8e$1@dont-email.me> <20240826083330.00004760@gmail.com> <vaises$2k7o6$2@dont-email.me> <20240826155113.000005ba@gmail.com> <wwvo75eicla.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vak9k9$2ujrs$1@dont-email.me> <valgpu$34s18$1@dont-email.me> <vannkg$3ig72$1@dont-email.me> <vanrd8$3j0vv$1@dont-email.me> <vantnp$3j94i$1@dont-email.me> <vapp91$3v4l8$3@dont-email.me> <var1e5$6186$1@dont-email.me> <vasfms$gcgq$1@dont-email.me> <vasmh7$hmds$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 02:00:17 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="54904188b92803ec7b4c49292238a0a9"; logging-data="738976"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19hMKfgdd/afxE5T9KLr7pU" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4Mwxtu50n/GAu9WL3iCuVnBLXvo= Bytes: 2735 On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 15:55:36 +0100, Bart wrote: > There's lot of things that language syntax might not need. For example, > I could dispense with the closing parentheses here: > > x = (a + (b + (c + d > > as they can supplied as needed at end-of-line. Then you can’t continue an expression across multiple lines. There was one language vaguely I recall (might have been a Lisp dialect) where a single “]” would be interpreted as closing all currently-unmatched “(”. Scheme, I believe, realizes that long lines of “))))” just make the (human) reader’s eyes glaze over, so they allow “[” and “]” with the same meanings as “(” and “)”, but you must pair like with like. As if “)])]” is much of an improvement. People can, and do, experiment with many different ideas in programming languages.