Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of [SR]
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:36:58 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <vav69q$109ac$10@dont-email.me>
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <17f0447be1dca708$639122$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <ac8e79f3bfccf996ed94acec6c9d056d@www.novabbs.com>
 <17f04b720f77a302$639131$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <e4c869edcf7644d2982936e78ff344ac@www.novabbs.com>
 <17f04f0aa442b204$602281$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <fefc23dfe9b6c853e4f260e6f9acc2f1@www.novabbs.com>
 <17f0660d33597e0a$609532$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <ecc1cbf0f484e237b82d312335a771c3@www.novabbs.com>
 <17f0863c3f05fd66$618168$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vasjam$e2la$16@dont-email.me>
 <17f087f24fe0f957$618169$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vaslcv$e2la$20@dont-email.me>
 <17f092fe6db35995$760519$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vav1nd$109ac$2@dont-email.me>
 <17f0d1c55cdbf285$768488$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vav4db$109ac$5@dont-email.me>
 <17f0d32671cd6d37$768491$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:36:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0bc100f5050f6c852213e21dd186125e";
	logging-data="1058124"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18mfKXp4LcIXUf+RYo0hz2e"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oCSIFp6U07c8hKzDwSjfjE0X7NA=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <17f0d32671cd6d37$768491$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4213

Le 31/08/2024 à 15:26, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 31.08.2024 o 15:04, Python pisze:
>> Le 31/08/2024 à 15:01, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 31.08.2024 o 14:18, Python pisze:
>>>> Le 30/08/2024 à 19:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>> W dniu 30.08.2024 o 16:36, Python pisze:
>>>>>> Le 30/08/2024 à 16:28, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>> W dniu 30.08.2024 o 16:00, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>> Le 30/08/2024 à 15:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> [boring nonsense]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maciej, did it come to your mind that your "argument" for the
>>>>>>>> inconsistency of SR is soooo damned simple that if it were
>>>>>>>> sound it would have been pointed out for ages by other people
>>>>>>>> than you? If not by scientists (i.e. for you "member of the
>>>>>>>> cult"), by other relativity deniers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, it is  so damned simple and it wasn't pointed
>>>>>>> out, [...] - so your "logic is as worthless
>>>>>>> as always.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course, it's a bit amazing that all physicists
>>>>>>> (and wannabe physicists as well) are so lost in
>>>>>>> their pathetic "Laws of Nature!!!!!" delusions
>>>>>>> that they're unable to make such a simple conclusion
>>>>>>> from a basic  definition they have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So all of human beings (at least the part that had thoughts
>>>>>> about Relativity) for more than a century is stupid and lost BUT a
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a much longer time.
>>>>
>>>> It would still be "more than a century" then :-)
>>>>
>>>> Anyway how much? Two centuries? Three centuries? More.
>>>>
>>>>> See, [...] - I've talked to many of you, and
>>>>> the result of asking any of you about the old
>>>>> definition of second is always the same: the
>>>>> asked [...] is "not understanding" the question.
>>>>
>>>> I doubt it.
>>>
>>> Don't give a damn to your doubts, that's how
>>> things are.
>>
>> They are not, and anybody can check.
>>
>>> Let's try again - with yourself, poor stinker.
>>> The definition  valid in physics in 1905 - was?
>>
>> It doesn't matter as Relativity
> 
> 
> See, [...] - your doubts were baseless.
> 
> 

You want me to post the definition of "kebab" Maciej? Really?

> -- 
> poor stinker