Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of [SR]
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 17:43:09 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <vavdmd$109ac$17@dont-email.me>
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <17f0660d33597e0a$609532$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <ecc1cbf0f484e237b82d312335a771c3@www.novabbs.com>
 <17f0863c3f05fd66$618168$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vasjam$e2la$16@dont-email.me>
 <17f087f24fe0f957$618169$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vaslcv$e2la$20@dont-email.me>
 <17f092fe6db35995$760519$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vav1nd$109ac$2@dont-email.me>
 <17f0d1c55cdbf285$768488$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vav4db$109ac$5@dont-email.me>
 <17f0d32671cd6d37$768491$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vav69q$109ac$10@dont-email.me>
 <17f0d4a4078e252f$768492$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vav7nq$109ac$12@dont-email.me>
 <17f0d54834d96449$659868$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vavan6$109ac$14@dont-email.me>
 <17f0d8d0a2d3573c$666917$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vavc4u$109ac$16@dont-email.me>
 <17f0d9ffa8d34b5f$698397$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 17:43:10 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0bc100f5050f6c852213e21dd186125e";
	logging-data="1058124"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uqNdbkGnrwp351z87W7/8"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2L5cVUMJCLoIPcPMSzXqJ3YYt3w=
In-Reply-To: <17f0d9ffa8d34b5f$698397$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3698

Le 31/08/2024 à 17:32, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 31.08.2024 o 17:16, Python pisze:
>> Le 31/08/2024 à 17:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 31.08.2024 o 16:52, Python pisze:
>> ...
>>>> "This question doesn't matter" is a perfectly adequate answer
>>>> to a question that actually does not matter in the context
>>>
>>> Python, [...] the context was - the [...]
>>> [scientists] like you to spelling
>>> the old, valid in 1905 (when [Einstein] lived
>>> [...]) definition of second.
>>>
>>> Of course, your lie of "doesn't matter" is also
>>> ridiculous. Does [SR] make any numeric
>>> predictions with units?
>>
>> It does.
>>
>>> if it does - how can
>>> the definitions of these units irrelevant ?
>>
>> For SR certainly. 
> 
> So, [SR] is making predictions like
> "the result will be [n] seconds - and
> what this second is doesn't matter for it?

Already answered:

For SR certainly. For experiments the definition and the
practicality of measuring devices is relevant.

This is why experiments usually use calibrated clocks of
some kind instead of building a full copy of the Solar System.

Such clocks being calibrated according to the current definition
of time, i.e.
- Decades ago against duration of a day
- Now using cesium atoms


> Well, sorry,

I'm sorry too that you are too dumb to understand my answer.

> Thus, of course, your hatred for  spelling
> that  definition can't be a surprise.

No more hatred than about spelling the definition of kebab.
As a matter of fact I mentioned above two definitions of a second.

No need to provide details, they are public you know?

> -- 
> trash, insane crazie

Nice signature !