Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 19:56:16 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vb0l4g$1bv4g$2@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <db885c7c1e1a5bfdf60e90fa9882bfb73b4e6ce7@i2pn2.org>
 <eY2Memk56jLKsrTeR3kBDQQqfHI@jntp>
 <bdfbb725-7fc3-4e17-b09b-4d6191d301a5@att.net>
 <tvUGDEKZBjBIOn4R0HIJvG5es4k@jntp>
 <d921df64d59a0bcdd17b4df10452e1b80df52a63@i2pn2.org>
 <bzKSpxSf9uNp5CqHyyYXjN1qFJg@jntp>
 <eca2fc989ec057bba94c874e86af6e33d8987f89@i2pn2.org>
 <dbDJOjuZlR22ACs9b5j_GQZcXac@jntp> <vaqg0e$2r8p$3@dont-email.me>
 <b2vtJ9qNt-ZZ4HcdVjYZeX0tOnI@jntp> <vat5ub$k5je$1@dont-email.me>
 <vat65b$k5jd$1@dont-email.me> <vb08r5$16m2f$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 04:56:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c1e49c322955d749858c780541ab0a9a";
	logging-data="1440912"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX181Mwwvo5Eu2XloGXVvwgB9C7jbxzLj8PI="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vhCbRhVK5ud+moh951Y4uVyW1Ek=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vb08r5$16m2f$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2367

On 8/31/2024 4:26 PM, Moebius wrote:
> Am 30.08.2024 um 21:22 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>> On 8/30/2024 12:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
>>>> 0 lies below the end. Hence there is an end, even if you cannot see it.
>>>
>>> 1/0 is NOT a unit fraction damn it! wow.
> 
>> We can all see 0.
> 
> Can we?

We can see the symbol used to represent zero? ;^)


> 
>> But its not a unit fraction. If it was, then 1/0 would be defined as a 
>> unit fraction, but 
> 
> You are mixing up things here.
> 
> Right 0 is not a unit fraction.
> 
> On the other hand, if s is a unit fraction, then 1/s is a natural number 
> (and vice versa).
> 
> "1/0" doesn't denote a real number. (Usually it's not even a defined term.)
> 
> In general we have for natural numbers n,m: n < m -> 1/n > 1/m.
>