Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 07:47:18 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <vb1665$1dlt4$12@dont-email.me>
References: <v9g9tq$14v2$1@dont-email.me>
	<wwvfrr72n8d.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <v9lbmq$115gc$1@dont-email.me>
	<vatpki$n4it$1@dont-email.me> <wwvwmjxkpwi.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
	<vb0c6u$17650$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 09:47:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="451ad815162a3f3080e1cdc6c6433f29";
	logging-data="1496996"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+4pINs5QKgCcAYZpmT8FmI"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RnMYuaUl4J/9XY+i3Hurvx6Be1o=
Bytes: 1488

On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 00:23:58 -0000 (UTC), bp wrote:

> Lawrence D'Oliviero's reply following yours touches on what I suspect is
> my greatest misunderstanding: I thought a self-signed certificate stood
> on its own.

You can do it that way. That requires importing every single self-signed 
cert one by one. If you need several of these, then setting up your own CA 
just makes things simpler.