| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vb22sp$1hpmu$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Kestrel Clayton <richZIG.e.clayZIGton@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Phillip Johnson wiki Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 11:57:13 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 279 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <vb22sp$1hpmu$1@dont-email.me> References: <vaoi4q$3ma1s$1@dont-email.me> <vavus6$14s1q$1@dont-email.me> <vb01a0$159dg$1@dont-email.me> <vb0292$15er6$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="44310"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:L0VtlDWkV+o8jrIWnUHtLHNsUn0= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 28F3222986F; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 11:57:13 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D3B22978C for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 11:57:10 -0400 (EDT) id A15595DC29; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 15:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by mod-relay-1.kamens.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BADC5DC26 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 15:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7957C5F839 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 15:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/7957C5F839; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com id 0B488DC01A9; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 17:57:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 17:57:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18e2ZeZEMNSdGvDaQwska3VTlgtWwDYRE0IfQ619weDydAqt28sFN6E Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vb0292$15er6$1@dont-email.me> FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_SBL_A, URI_DOTEDU autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 * 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was * blocked. See * http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block * for more information. * [URIs: wikipedia.org] * 1.0 FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD 'From' gmail.com does not match 'Received' * headers * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail * provider * [richzig.e.clayzigton[at]gmail.com] * 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override * is CUSTOM_MED * 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level * mail domains are different * 0.1 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL * blocklist * [URIs: web.archive.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and * EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different * -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. * 1.0 URI_DOTEDU Has .edu URI * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla * 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing * list smtp.eternal-september.org Bytes: 18520 On 31-Aug-24 17:34, x wrote: > On 8/31/24 14:17, Kestrel Clayton wrote: >> On 31-Aug-24 16:36, x wrote: >>> On 8/28/24 18:16, RonO wrote: >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillip_E._Johnson >>>> >>>> Earlier this month I noted that someone had remove the Johnson >>>> capitulation quote from the Johnson wiki. There seems to be no >>>> valid reason for removing the quote, and Athel claimed that he had >>>> emailed the editor that made the edit to see what was going on. I >>>> guess nothing has come of the request. >>>> >>>> The quote actually brings closure to the entire wiki entry of which >>>> a major part is about Johnson's participation in the intelligent >>>> design creationist scam. >>>> >>>> There is absolutely no doubt that Phillip Johnson wanted ID taught >>>> in the public schools. He had made it part of his Wedge strategy. >>>> It was one of the 5 years goals listed in the Wedge document, but >>>> 20/20 hindsight indicates that Johnson never fully understood the >>>> science, and did not understand that the ID perps never had any >>>> legitimate ID science worth teaching in the public schools. >>>> >>>> The Phillip Johnson wiki has the claim that Johnson did not >>>> understand scientific reasoning "In 1993 the ASA's Perspectives on >>>> Science and Christian Faith published a review of Darwin on Trial by >>>> Nancey Murphy, an associate professor of Christian philosophy at >>>> Fuller Theological Seminary, who described Johnson's arguments as >>>> "dogmatic and unconvincing", primarily because "he does not >>>> adequately understand scientific reasoning."" Johnson had been >>>> convinced by the other ID perps that the ID science existed, and >>>> could be taught in the public schools. >>>> >>>> Johnson got others involved in the ID scam. Most notably then >>>> Senator Santorum. Johnson supposedly wrote the draft of the IDiotic >>>> "amendment" to the no child left behind legislation that was >>>> submitted by Santorum and ended up in the appendix of that >>>> legislation. Both Santorum and Johnson claimed that the inclusion >>>> of the "amendment" supported teaching intelligent design in the >>>> public schools. >>>> >>>> By 2002 most of the other ID perps at the Discovery Institute likely >>>> understood that they had nothing worth teaching as ID science in the >>>> public schools, so when Ohio hit the fan and the ID perps were >>>> invited to give their dog and pony show to the Ohio State School >>>> board the ID perps decided to start running a bait and switch scam >>>> where they would just use ID as bait, but only give the rubes an >>>> obfuscation and denial swtich scam that the ID perps would tell the >>>> creationist rubes had nothing to do with ID. It does not look like >>>> the ID perps bothered to inform Santorum and Johnson of what they >>>> planned to do because both Johnson and Santorum came out in support >>>> of teaching ID in the public schools in Ohio before the bait and >>>> switch went down. >>>> >>>> Johnson put up the Santorum editorial on his ARN blog as the bait >>>> and switch was going down in Ohio. There is no reason why Johnson >>>> would hang Santorum, out to dry like that if he knew that the bait >>>> and switch scam was going to start to go down, and no reason for >>>> Santorum to have written the opinion piece if he knew that the bait >>>> and switch was going down. >>>> >>>> https://www.arn.org/docs/ohio/washtimes_santorum031402.htm >>>> >>>> QUOTE: >>>> "I hate your opinions, but I would die to defend your right to express >>>> them." This famous quote by the 18th-century philosopher Voltaire >>>> applies to the debate currently raging in Ohio. The Board of Education >>>> is discussing whether to include alternate theories of evolution in the >>>> classroom. Some board members however, are opposed to Voltaire's >>>> defense >>>> of rational inquiry and intellectual tolerance. They are seeking to >>>> prohibit different theories other than Darwinism, from being taught to >>>> students. This threatens freedom of thought and academic excellence. >>>> >>>> Today, the Board of Education will discuss a proposal to insert >>>> "intelligent design" alongside evolution in the state's new teaching >>>> standards. >>>> END QUOTE: >>>> >>>> QUOTE: >>>> At the beginning of the year, President Bush signed into law the "No >>>> Child Left Behind" bill. The new law includes a science education >>>> provision where Congress states that "where topics are taught that may >>>> generate controversy (such as biological evolution), the curriculum >>>> should help students to understand the full range of scientific views >>>> that exist." If the Education Board of Ohio does not include >>>> intelligent >>>> design in the new teaching standards, many students will be denied a >>>> first-rate science education. Many will be left behind. >>>> >>>> Rick Santorum is a Republican member of the United States Senate from >>>> Pennsylvania. >>>> >>>> © 2002 News World Communications. All rights reserved. International >>>> copyright secured. >>>> File Date: 3.14.02 >>>> END QUOTE: >>>> >>>> So neither Santorum nor Johnson likely knew of the strategy shift >>>> for the ID scam. After Ohio 2002 the ID perps only used the teach >>>> ID scam as bait, and never delivered any ID science to any >>>> creationist rubes that wanted to teach it. >>>> >>>> You could still download the teach ID scam booklet from a Discovery >>>> Institute web site when Dover hit the fan, but the bait and switch >>>> had gone down in every case for the previous 3 years after Ohio. >>>> >>>> https://web.archive.org/web/20040921022045/http://www.discovery.org/ >>>> scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=58 >>>> >>>> QUOTE: >>>> 9. Conclusion >>>> Local school boards and state education officials are >>>> frequently pressured to avoid teaching the controversy regarding >>>> biological origins. Indeed, many groups, such as the National >>>> Academy of Sciences, go so far as to deny the existence of any >>>> genuine scientific controversy about the issue.(162) Nevertheless, >>>> teachers should be reassured that they have the right to expose >>>> their students to the problems as well as the appeal of Darwinian >>>> theory. Moreover, as the previous discussion demonstrates, school >>>> boards have the authority to permit, and even encourage, teaching >>>> about design theory as an alternative to Darwinian evolution--and >>>> this includes the use of textbooks such as Of Pandas and People that >>>> present evidence for the theory of intelligent design. ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========