Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vb27p9$1i5d6$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 19:21:57 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 52 Message-ID: <vb27p9$1i5d6$1@dont-email.me> References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp> <vasgsq$go2j$1@dont-email.me> <TjDY9uUVn5uYrwKeP_H1Mk0G5x8@jntp> <ljfrjfF3hr1U1@mid.individual.net> <IqoVDZIyxVoLReItZ3sD4aYyQ64@jntp> <vavtbs$14qma$1@dont-email.me> <pheofpwVPcOT3RCuNcESEqS47x0@jntp> <vb1dpe$1evqr$1@dont-email.me> <NVcS6uZDkN8UGhkdIwwkCs4R7x8@jntp> <vb1mk4$1g551$1@dont-email.me> <siZVeXFhx1b-RHNvgyKaFJEz2Sc@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 19:20:42 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="886b4d3bd73320fe2e1cc750ee381a6c"; logging-data="1643942"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX181BclLo/2grcWpJiMvr8xL" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:+y+162DvbostWHvhEQeee6XqwU0= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <siZVeXFhx1b-RHNvgyKaFJEz2Sc@jntp> Bytes: 2497 Den 01.09.2024 16:13, skrev Richard Hachel: > Le 01/09/2024 à 14:27, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : >> Den 01.09.2024 13:25, skrev Richard Hachel: >>> >>> Nous allons maintenant donner des précisions numériques. >>> >>> AB (at rest) = 3.10^8m >>> A'B' (at rest) = 3.10^8m >>> >>> v=0.8c >> >> https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual_time_dilation.pdf >> >> Still a problem with equation (1)? >> >> t₂ = 0.75052 second > > I do not accept your answer. Your problem. c = 299792458 m/s d = 3e8 m v = 0.8⋅c = 239833966.4 m/s t₂ = (d/v)⋅√(1−v²/c²) = 0.75052 second > > c=10^8m/s, that is to say, in my example, c=3.0000000000.10^8m/s What the hell is your point? You didn't give a speed of light 'in your example', but that's OK because I know the speed of light. > > Please, respect. Why? I don't respect you. > > t₂ = ? Why didn't you calculate calculate t₂ with the wrong speed of light? Is the equation t₂ = (d/v)⋅√(1−v²/c²) beyond your mathematical capabilities? -- Paul https://paulba.no/