Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vb2t56$1ljuq$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 19:25:26 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <vb2t56$1ljuq$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 01:25:27 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f3e14d03da545cb996f763a8b21ff415"; logging-data="1757146"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/6mUlNZVqGCRNbRSMOUGg8p5L53BaX0cs=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:XTOhTaSfuH+/yq/wAgJUSqxTO8I= Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1658 Looking at replacing an old Canon 'CanoScan LiDE 110' that seems to be fading away (bulb's going yellow). Its USB connected; I use it quite a bit w/MacOS's "Image Capture" app, and documents to PDF. Looking around at equivalents, I think I've narrowed it down to two: * Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 * Epson Perfection V39 II It looks like both are currently supported in MacOS Sonoma 14.x Any particular plus/minus or other observations? Cost difference is negligible ($80 vs $90). A couple of things that I've found: * Epson is USB-2 (disappointing) & has separate power supply * Canon claims USB-C but not which flavor/version thereof. * Documentation isn't clear if the Epson supports scan-to-PDF. Thoughts? -hh