| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vb2u3v$1ls0b$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 01:41:50 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 53 Message-ID: <vb2u3v$1ls0b$2@dont-email.me> References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp> <ljfrjfF3hr1U1@mid.individual.net> <IqoVDZIyxVoLReItZ3sD4aYyQ64@jntp> <vavtbs$14qma$1@dont-email.me> <pheofpwVPcOT3RCuNcESEqS47x0@jntp> <vb1dpe$1evqr$1@dont-email.me> <NVcS6uZDkN8UGhkdIwwkCs4R7x8@jntp> <vb1mk4$1g551$1@dont-email.me> <siZVeXFhx1b-RHNvgyKaFJEz2Sc@jntp> <vb27p9$1i5d6$1@dont-email.me> <vWfLvh8Z8vhNLMZ2a6tDPPujI6Q@jntp> <dt-dndfM2M12LUn7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <1_ecnXW_XLpaJUn7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 01:41:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="137f08e8427e5f9d4f3bec1a79702d82"; logging-data="1765387"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+VyVxyO0mOmo/wDe04oDCb" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:PbEAGROkdpM+Nds5FPMEowaQ62w= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <1_ecnXW_XLpaJUn7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> Bytes: 2740 Le 01/09/2024 à 20:56, Ross Finlayson a écrit : > On 09/01/2024 11:22 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> On 09/01/2024 10:38 AM, Richard Hachel wrote: >>> Le 01/09/2024 à 19:20, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : >>>> Den 01.09.2024 16:13, skrev Richard Hachel: >>> >>>> Why didn't you calculate calculate t₂ with the wrong speed of light? >>>> Is the equation t₂ = (d/v)⋅√(1−v²/c²) beyond your mathematical >>>> capabilities? >>> >>> Vr=Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²) >>> >>> Vr=4c/3 >>> >>> t₂=x/Vr=0.75sec >>> >>> R.H. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Yet, if you square that, then take the root, >> is it not that triangle inequality replaces 0.25? >> >> The difference? >> >> >> This is a large part of when things are squared >> or stored in roots for no reason then as with >> regards to that as an indicator, or "dimension", >> where a "dimension" only needs one bit an "indicator", >> triangle rule the bit indicator for the quadrant, >> that in these things making numerical emergence >> for continuity, it's often the most usual rule >> any matters of direction, "what 0.75 means". >> >> It's like "power law" or "normal distribution", >> "sure, it fits". >> >> > > "Centralizing tendency" You want to play ? "Globalizing serendipity" Your turn.