Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 01:41:50 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <vb2u3v$1ls0b$2@dont-email.me>
References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp>
 <ljfrjfF3hr1U1@mid.individual.net> <IqoVDZIyxVoLReItZ3sD4aYyQ64@jntp>
 <vavtbs$14qma$1@dont-email.me> <pheofpwVPcOT3RCuNcESEqS47x0@jntp>
 <vb1dpe$1evqr$1@dont-email.me> <NVcS6uZDkN8UGhkdIwwkCs4R7x8@jntp>
 <vb1mk4$1g551$1@dont-email.me> <siZVeXFhx1b-RHNvgyKaFJEz2Sc@jntp>
 <vb27p9$1i5d6$1@dont-email.me> <vWfLvh8Z8vhNLMZ2a6tDPPujI6Q@jntp>
 <dt-dndfM2M12LUn7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <1_ecnXW_XLpaJUn7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 01:41:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="137f08e8427e5f9d4f3bec1a79702d82";
	logging-data="1765387"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+VyVxyO0mOmo/wDe04oDCb"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PbEAGROkdpM+Nds5FPMEowaQ62w=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <1_ecnXW_XLpaJUn7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
Bytes: 2740

Le 01/09/2024 à 20:56, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> On 09/01/2024 11:22 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 09/01/2024 10:38 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>> Le 01/09/2024 à 19:20, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>>>> Den 01.09.2024 16:13, skrev Richard Hachel:
>>>
>>>> Why didn't you calculate  calculate t₂ with the wrong speed of light?
>>>> Is the equation t₂ = (d/v)⋅√(1−v²/c²) beyond your mathematical
>>>> capabilities?
>>>
>>> Vr=Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
>>>
>>> Vr=4c/3
>>>
>>> t₂=x/Vr=0.75sec
>>>
>>> R.H.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yet, if you square that, then take the root,
>> is it not that triangle inequality replaces 0.25?
>>
>> The difference?
>>
>>
>> This is a large part of when things are squared
>> or stored in roots for no reason then as with
>> regards to that as an indicator, or "dimension",
>> where a "dimension" only needs one bit an "indicator",
>> triangle rule the bit indicator for the quadrant,
>> that in these things making numerical emergence
>> for continuity, it's often the most usual rule
>> any matters of direction, "what 0.75 means".
>>
>> It's like "power law" or "normal distribution",
>> "sure, it fits".
>>
>>
> 
> "Centralizing tendency"

You want to play ?

"Globalizing serendipity"

Your turn.