Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 05:29:01 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 93
Message-ID: <vb3bdt$1r27p$1@dont-email.me>
References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp>
 <ljfrjfF3hr1U1@mid.individual.net> <IqoVDZIyxVoLReItZ3sD4aYyQ64@jntp>
 <vavtbs$14qma$1@dont-email.me> <pheofpwVPcOT3RCuNcESEqS47x0@jntp>
 <vb1dpe$1evqr$1@dont-email.me> <NVcS6uZDkN8UGhkdIwwkCs4R7x8@jntp>
 <vb1mk4$1g551$1@dont-email.me> <siZVeXFhx1b-RHNvgyKaFJEz2Sc@jntp>
 <vb27p9$1i5d6$1@dont-email.me> <vWfLvh8Z8vhNLMZ2a6tDPPujI6Q@jntp>
 <dt-dndfM2M12LUn7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <1_ecnXW_XLpaJUn7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vb2u3v$1ls0b$2@dont-email.me>
 <a-WcnefTnNjSvkj7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 05:29:02 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="137f08e8427e5f9d4f3bec1a79702d82";
	logging-data="1935609"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Fzv5T5H3ROrm/2njWvenH"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:00NlLPUCQGc0GITay2N35J+wdQI=
In-Reply-To: <a-WcnefTnNjSvkj7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4192

Le 02/09/2024 à 04:30, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> On 09/01/2024 04:41 PM, Python wrote:
>> Le 01/09/2024 à 20:56, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>> On 09/01/2024 11:22 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>> On 09/01/2024 10:38 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>>>> Le 01/09/2024 à 19:20, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>>>>>> Den 01.09.2024 16:13, skrev Richard Hachel:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why didn't you calculate  calculate t₂ with the wrong speed of light?
>>>>>> Is the equation t₂ = (d/v)⋅√(1−v²/c²) beyond your mathematical
>>>>>> capabilities?
>>>>>
>>>>> Vr=Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
>>>>>
>>>>> Vr=4c/3
>>>>>
>>>>> t₂=x/Vr=0.75sec
>>>>>
>>>>> R.H.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yet, if you square that, then take the root,
>>>> is it not that triangle inequality replaces 0.25?
>>>>
>>>> The difference?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a large part of when things are squared
>>>> or stored in roots for no reason then as with
>>>> regards to that as an indicator, or "dimension",
>>>> where a "dimension" only needs one bit an "indicator",
>>>> triangle rule the bit indicator for the quadrant,
>>>> that in these things making numerical emergence
>>>> for continuity, it's often the most usual rule
>>>> any matters of direction, "what 0.75 means".
>>>>
>>>> It's like "power law" or "normal distribution",
>>>> "sure, it fits".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> "Centralizing tendency"
>>
>> You want to play ?
>>
>> "Globalizing serendipity"
>>
>> Your turn.
>>
>>
> 
> Well, there's nothing to follow serendipity,
> the serendipity is the emergent what's found,
> "global" is a bit redundant, and, "globalizing"
> doesn't necessarily apply, as not all find it.
> 
> As a universal and an ideal and transcendental,
> though, serendipity itself shares with other
> universal, ideal, transcendental concepts.
> 
> The "centralizing tendency" or "polarizing tendencies"
> or "uniformizing tendencies" or "agitating tendencies",
> then for tendencies and propensities, mostly result
> reflecting in tendencies and propensities,
> the oscillation and restitution, though
> the attenuation and dissipation.
> 
> The "serendipity" is a nice place to visit.
> 
> 
> I don't know if the book about Serendipity
> in the children's literature is still very
> widely read, there's a picture book that
> introduces the concept through the lens of
> a character, Serendip.
> 
> The concept then is given as a happy place
> and an alignment, or as like that "a serendipity
> is like a syzygy, a happenstance emergence in
> order as what's yet sublime".
> 
> 

:-)

Nice.