Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vb4qo5$22fb4$1@solani.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 18:56:37 +0200
Message-ID: <vb4qo5$22fb4$1@solani.org>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <db885c7c1e1a5bfdf60e90fa9882bfb73b4e6ce7@i2pn2.org>
 <eY2Memk56jLKsrTeR3kBDQQqfHI@jntp>
 <bdfbb725-7fc3-4e17-b09b-4d6191d301a5@att.net>
 <tvUGDEKZBjBIOn4R0HIJvG5es4k@jntp>
 <d921df64d59a0bcdd17b4df10452e1b80df52a63@i2pn2.org>
 <bzKSpxSf9uNp5CqHyyYXjN1qFJg@jntp>
 <eca2fc989ec057bba94c874e86af6e33d8987f89@i2pn2.org>
 <dbDJOjuZlR22ACs9b5j_GQZcXac@jntp> <vaqg0e$2r8p$3@dont-email.me>
 <b2vtJ9qNt-ZZ4HcdVjYZeX0tOnI@jntp> <vat5ub$k5je$1@dont-email.me>
 <vb08e8$16m2g$1@dont-email.me> <vb0l0r$1bv4g$1@dont-email.me>
 <vb0mv2$1c4hh$1@dont-email.me> <vb2e67$1jf12$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 16:56:37 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="2178404"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XOPSz2p2Rnv0hT6jA7KxsMZFdJM=
Content-Language: en-US
X-User-ID: eJwFwYkRwDAIA7CVEh4D4/QcvP8IldJxwQokIpWKHnCfDkpcIx6kOAY1x+ZD9lJjtytOb7XTykObcML4A172FWM=
In-Reply-To: <vb2e67$1jf12$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2159
Lines: 16

On 01.09.2024 21:09, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/31/2024 8:27 PM, Moebius wrote:

>> In general, for all x e IR, x > 0: NUF(x) = aleph_0.

Don't get confused by that nonsense. Everybody knows that unit fractions 
are different from each other. Therefore they cannot be counted at the 
same x, let alone at less than all positive x, i.e., at zero.
>>
> How does that fit with WM who thinks there is a smallest unit fraction 
> to start counting from?

I do not think that but I prove that by the simple fact that not more 
than one unit fraction can be lessequal than all unit fractions.

Regards, WM