Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 19:24:58 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <vb4sas$2u11j$1@dont-email.me>
References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp>
 <ljfrjfF3hr1U1@mid.individual.net> <IqoVDZIyxVoLReItZ3sD4aYyQ64@jntp>
 <vavtbs$14qma$1@dont-email.me> <pheofpwVPcOT3RCuNcESEqS47x0@jntp>
 <vb1dpe$1evqr$1@dont-email.me> <NVcS6uZDkN8UGhkdIwwkCs4R7x8@jntp>
 <vb1mk4$1g551$1@dont-email.me> <siZVeXFhx1b-RHNvgyKaFJEz2Sc@jntp>
 <vb28vm$1i5d6$2@dont-email.me> <2VJMHmUL3oTjzHTxkbHeeVgwp1A@jntp>
 <vb2tvf$1ls0b$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 19:23:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dcec4cda9125e37d18460db61bdf902b";
	logging-data="3081267"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/a84vzoD4oIZNLuiBILTyx"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mu5i4w9lpqpcKPnnUhnGb94ICT8=
In-Reply-To: <vb2tvf$1ls0b$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2431

Den 02.09.2024 01:39, skrev Python:
> Le 01/09/2024 à 22:29, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>> tA (e1)= 0
> 
> If you insist, but this in no way a requisite of Einstein-Poincaré's
> synchronization procedure. t_A = 451 is another possible value :-)
> 
>> tA'(e1)= 0
> 
> LOL!!! Whaaat the Hell is that???
> 
>> tA (e2)= 0.75
> 
> Irrelevant. The time marked by clock A "when" B received the first
> signal is undefined at that time (i.e. "when" is undefined for remote
> events). It does play any role in the procedure. Fortunately.
> 

You are misunderstanding.
Richard never quote what he is responding to, so the context
is lost.

This is not about Einstein's synchronisation method,
but about this paper:

https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual_time_dilation.pdf

tA(e1) = 0
tA'(e1)= 0
by definition

With Richards (unrealistic as always) numbers:
c ≈ 3e8 m/s
d = 3e8 m
v = 0.8c
tA(e2) = (d/v)⋅√(1−v²/c²) ≈ 0.75 seconds

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/