| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vb51oo$2v0pc$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Futexes ain't fast Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:56:24 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Message-ID: <vb51oo$2v0pc$3@dont-email.me> References: <van414$3fe9t$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vashj8$gpjk$1@dont-email.me> <vat7ft$k5je$7@dont-email.me> <vatohm$mu0b$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 20:56:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="37ad5ea9d8adc5b106b971373399347c"; logging-data="3113772"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/XYUtL1tDNKbYwKtAUfB6cRD3fDuRirf0=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:lVRmMciKPd2tNylzZ7U0p4SJubY= In-Reply-To: <vatohm$mu0b$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US On 8/30/2024 5:36 PM, jseigh wrote: > On 8/30/24 15:45, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 8/30/2024 6:31 AM, jseigh wrote: > ... >>> >>> They don't have to be fast, they just have to allow correct >>> synchronization >>> and allow performant fast paths. Can the api be improved for the >>> latter? >>> Certainly yes. It is an awkward api to use. >> >> 100% agreed. Eventcounts are in the mix as well. >> > > You might take a look at folly's eventcount. It (I think) only calls > futex wake if there are waiters, and only calls futex_wait if the > eventcount hasn't been incremented. I did my own C version since I'm > working in C for now. I need to look at it. Have been really busy lately. I think you said that eventcounts can be a little "too" lock-free? ;^)