Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vb5mon$31vc8$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: People Without Meaningful Lives Seek Power Over Others Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 19:54:49 -0500 Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd. Lines: 82 Message-ID: <vb5mon$31vc8$2@dont-email.me> References: <7knrcj5q82pse9ce8hjo458kkf0jfadh35@4ax.com> <h2vscjlvas4pdkj1clutgm2ehcli4drpe6@4ax.com> <tc7ucjl2or9ves52ik1ku4d4dl1055addu@4ax.com> <van784$3fmps$3@dont-email.me> <sEIzO.81262$Oqi9.29478@fx16.iad> <vanrf4$3j0ji$3@dont-email.me> <L%NzO.4114$eS_9.1269@fx04.iad> <vaooit$3qjup$2@dont-email.me> <XWnAO.175025$Oqi9.626@fx16.iad> <v154dj1mf1cbimohl06cirrnn96imug6bs@4ax.com> <Y%rAO.149802$jia4.79040@fx18.iad> <gpm4dj9tlf6vl54b32fgg5ahtphg6k6h8o@4ax.com> <0RlBO.3$8bZd.0@fx02.iad> <uesbdjdcpa4ch2qfgchetasv0ltte34lj3@4ax.com> <vb52h5$2utb2$1@dont-email.me> <vb5m7t$31pj4$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 02:54:48 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="469f4be551c3f8776bcdcd75f520bb6f"; logging-data="3210632"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18htpt5PT/nleKNvDIjQtrQ" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:pjTMW+hpVtqw5yeXIZ6L9s6Fdf0= In-Reply-To: <vb5m7t$31pj4$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4828 On 9/2/2024 7:45 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: > On 9/2/2024 3:09 PM, AMuzi wrote: >> On 9/2/2024 12:51 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: >>> On Mon, 02 Sep 2024 16:37:16 GMT, cyclintom >>> <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Why do you try so hard to be smart? >>> >>> To make you look dumb by comparison, to keep you >>> entertained and >>> because intelligence tends to pay better than stupidity. >>> >> >> Since generalities about humans are generally not >> all-inclusive, many things can be true and not true >> depending on 'for whom?'. >> >> Charles Murray has an excellent take on one type of >> achievement this week, so well done that it is de-paywalled: >> >> >> https://www.wsj.com/opinion/the-roots-of-stem-excellence-higher- education-cognitive-ability-over-dei-df09f6c7?st=lnae1l50jqogeuv > > OK, interesting article. Some observations: > > First, the article strongly acknowledges the obvious (to me) > fact that not everyone can learn everything. I've made that > point here many times. > > It also pays homage to the normal curves I frequently > mention, which is another way of making the same point. > Those on the extreme tails of the curve are far different > from the great bulk near the center. > > The article also touts, strongly, the value of education. > Can you imagine the author's reaction Tom's claim that he is > as good as a degreed engineer because he "read out" three > libraries? Or the tricycle rider's claim that professors > just sit and push papers around? > > Going farther: I do agree that our nation should be devoting > more resources to supporting and challenging those at the > top of the curve. The societal benefits would likely be far > greater than, say, helping those at the bottom to achieve > mediocrity. > > And I strongly believe the author's statement that "the > students in these elite STEM departments will be more than > 90% Asian or white and more than 80% male" speaks to > societal conditions, and certainly not to genetic > predispositions. I had female graduates who easily > outperformed the men in class, and did great work after they > graduated. I hope our culture could be changed so not only > white (or Asian) males were supported and challenged into > tech education and professional roles. There's too little of > that happening now. > > Also, not all work needs to be Nobel-worthy. We will always > need competent STEM workers from the Nobel level all the way > down to the technician level. > > And finally: The article does mention that "hard labor" as > well as talent is very necessary for the kinds of > achievements the author wants. When I was in graduate > school, I think all my peers agreed on who was the most > brilliant of us. His mental horsepower was pretty > astonishing - as in, not bothering to study much for exams, > but routinely topping the curve. > > But he ended up dropping out of his PhD program at a > nationally renowned university. Last I heard, he runs his > family's pharmacy. > Thought some of us would find that interesting or even provocative. -- Andrew Muzi am@yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971