Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vb6hv7$39dvq$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:39:03 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 25 Message-ID: <vb6hv7$39dvq$1@dont-email.me> References: <vb0lkb$1c1kh$2@dont-email.me> <vb1hdi$1feme$1@dont-email.me> <vb4erg$2s0uc$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 10:39:03 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4d0c86081244eebfddf3fd229f0dd949"; logging-data="3454970"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CbFd2OwhIYbUN3ID5aEAs" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:A/3L1fYjiezmlGvpmjzCaRdaemA= Bytes: 1618 On 2024-09-02 13:33:36 +0000, olcott said: > On 9/1/2024 5:58 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-09-01 03:04:43 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> *I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases* >>> >>> knowledge is a justified true belief such that the >>> justification is sufficient reason to accept the >>> truth of the belief. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem >> >> The remaining loophole is the lack of an exact definition >> of "sufficient reason". >> > > Ultimately sufficient reason is correct semantic > entailment from verified facts. The problem is "verified" facts: what is sufficient verification? -- Mikko