Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vb6mna$23gm0$1@solani.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: I can't stand Mira Murati's Eyewash (Was: Holy Shit: AI is cheaper than Humans (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)) Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 12:00:11 +0200 Message-ID: <vb6mna$23gm0$1@solani.org> References: <v67685$6fr5$1@solani.org> <vb2jdo$202pl$3@solani.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 10:00:10 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="2212544"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:imkUCOAuP76XGKd34e/do25dBi0= X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLzQifHKDUv4TdqRhsnKZGffpuAcJiT+xl82ju5ocJz2EvMlnzUFX+ILd49ohGmHb74gdmMRXn In-Reply-To: <vb2jdo$202pl$3@solani.org> Bytes: 4048 Lines: 87 What a bullshit: Another concern is the potential for AI to displace jobs and exacerbate economic inequality. A recent study by McKinsey estimates that up to 800 million jobs could be automated by 2030. While Murati believes that AI will ultimately create more jobs than it displaces, she acknowledges the need for policies to support workers through the transition, such as job retraining programs and strengthened social safety nets. https://expertbeacon.com/mira-murati-shaping-the-future-of-ai-ethics-and-innovation-at-openai/ Lets say there is a wine valley. All workers are replaced by AI robots. Where do they go. In some cultures you don't find people over 30 that are long life learners. What should they learn, on another valley where they harvest oranges, they also replaced everybody by AI robots. And so on the next valley, and the next valley. We need NGO's and a Greta Thunberg for AI ethics, not a nice face from OpenAI. Mild Shock schrieb: > > The carbon emissions of writing and illustrating > are lower for AI than for humans > https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54271-x > > Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas says that the cost per > query in AI models has decreased by 100x in the past > 2 years and quality will improve as hallucinations > decrease 10x per year > https://twitter.com/tsarnick/status/1830045611036721254 > > Disclaimer: Can't verify the later claim... need to find a paper. > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Could be a wake-up call this many participants >> already in the commitee, that the whole logic >> world was asleep for many years: >> >> Non-Classical Logics. Theory and Applications XI, >> 5-8 September 2024, Lodz (Poland) >> https://easychair.org/cfp/NCL24 >> >> Why is Minimal Logic at the core of many things? >> Because it is the logic of Curry-Howard isomoprhism >> for symple types: >> >> ---------------- >> Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ A >> >> Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ B >> ---------------- >> Γ ⊢ A → B >> >> Γ ⊢ A → B Δ ⊢ A >> ---------------------------- >> Γ ∪ Δ ⊢ B >> >> And funny things can happen, especially when people >> hallucinate duality or think symmetry is given, for >> example in newer inventions such as λμ-calculus, >> >> but then omg ~~p => p is nevertheless not provable, >> because they forgot an inference rule. LoL >> >> Recommended reading so far: >> >> Propositional Logics Related to Heyting’s and Johansson’s >> February 2008 - Krister Segerberg >> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228036664 >> >> The Logic of Church and Curry >> Jonathan P. Seldin - 2009 >> https://www.sciencedirect.com/handbook/handbook-of-the-history-of-logic/vol/5/suppl/C >> >> >> Meanwhile I am going back to my tinkering with my >> Prolog system, which even provides a more primitive >> logic than minimal logic, pure Prolog is minimal >> >> logic without embedded implication. >