Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vb8ga5$3m0tm$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 21:23:01 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 54 Message-ID: <vb8ga5$3m0tm$1@dont-email.me> References: <vb0lkb$1c1kh$2@dont-email.me> <vb1hdi$1feme$1@dont-email.me> <vb4erg$2s0uc$1@dont-email.me> <vb6hv7$39dvq$1@dont-email.me> <vb71fn$3b4ub$5@dont-email.me> <47b73f13831610508a05f1ec3b90c2c5e6c16957@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 04:23:02 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dd43bdf9b61f877c9b4c44ca800456cb"; logging-data="3867574"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19HYDG+6Ez8Amz7mT70iouq" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:doHH/xhEqJLIljHZ5z87Pl0BYgE= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <47b73f13831610508a05f1ec3b90c2c5e6c16957@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 2759 On 9/3/2024 9:17 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 9/3/24 9:03 AM, olcott wrote: >> On 9/3/2024 3:39 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> On 2024-09-02 13:33:36 +0000, olcott said: >>> >>>> On 9/1/2024 5:58 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>> On 2024-09-01 03:04:43 +0000, olcott said: >>>>> >>>>>> *I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases* >>>>>> >>>>>> knowledge is a justified true belief such that the >>>>>> justification is sufficient reason to accept the >>>>>> truth of the belief. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem >>>>> >>>>> The remaining loophole is the lack of an exact definition >>>>> of "sufficient reason". >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ultimately sufficient reason is correct semantic >>>> entailment from verified facts. >>> >>> The problem is "verified" facts: what is sufficient verification? >>> >> >> Stipulated to be true is always sufficient: >> Cats are a know if animal. >> > > "Stipulated to be true" is incorrect logic. > Stipulated to be true is the actual foundation of linguistic truth. > >> Empirically verified to be true in the current moment: >> I have a left hand right now, is sufficient. >> > > Are you SURE you have a left hand. You could just be a brain in a giant > simulation. > I have allowed for that. > You could have lost you left hand and have a great prosthesis. > > Observations can not be "proved" to be totally accurate. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer