Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 14:05:54 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <vb9if2$3qjfp$2@dont-email.me>
References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp> <vaa4om$sicr$16@dont-email.me>
 <tAXYNx1-wzYUg_H0N6FWnLiQgFs@jntp> <vasgsq$go2j$1@dont-email.me>
 <TjDY9uUVn5uYrwKeP_H1Mk0G5x8@jntp> <ljfrjfF3hr1U1@mid.individual.net>
 <IqoVDZIyxVoLReItZ3sD4aYyQ64@jntp> <ljifq8FfkpfU4@mid.individual.net>
 <n1NunzaSneGRSHWe2aSXzpS1tkE@jntp> <ljl42mFrt9qU2@mid.individual.net>
 <p2RSa2nmyY3QibDdou42v9g0HlQ@jntp> <ljnmhfF974rU6@mid.individual.net>
 <ljqg76FmfojU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 14:05:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8d71566ceadf1b6fe05dd5e1564538d";
	logging-data="4017657"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+G7KVeudemo8CXvt3uUlrp"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bt7oUZSQ24zC2CaO+zye/9UfIEU=
In-Reply-To: <ljqg76FmfojU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3852

Le 04/09/2024 à 09:24, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> Am Dienstag000003, 03.09.2024 um 07:53 schrieb Thomas Heger:
>> Am Montag000002, 02.09.2024 um 14:16 schrieb Richard Hachel:
>>> Le 02/09/2024 à 08:25, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I use the observation, that clocks around the Earth surface tick at 
>>>> the same rate, while they don't tick at the same rate at different 
>>>> altitudes.
>>>
>>> There is already a bias here.
>>> If a watch is placed at altitude, it does not evolve at the same 
>>> speed as a fixed watch placed at the level of our local mass 
>>> reference center that we could put the sun, or even the galactic 
>>> center. The effects of these reference frames are perhaps negligible. 
>>> I do not know. But at least, the effects of the revolution of the 
>>> object around the center of the earth are not the same as the effects
>>> on an object placed on the surface of the ground. Worse, for the 
>>> object placed on the surface of the ground, it is the center of the 
>>> earth that rotates around it; and also for the other. These effects 
>>> are no longer really Galilean, but effects of rotating reference 
>>> frames for which I have given the equations, and which cause some 
>>> surprises (it is the object that goes the fastest that has the time 
>>> that passes the fastest, contrary to Galilean effects).
>>>
>> There exist no 'center of the universe', because everything moves.
>>
>> If we define a certer of our own local frame of reference, we do this 
>> for pratical purposes, even if no such thing as a center would exist.
>>
>>
>> I personally prefer a setting, where the observer in question rests in 
>> the center of his own frame of reference.
>>
>> I call this perspective 'subjectivism', because this is the view we 
>> have from the world around us.
>>
>> We could use any other point, however, if we decide to do so.
>>
>> But this wouldn't make this point the center of the world, but the 
>> center of our frame of reference.
>>
>> But none of these 'centers' is actually real, because the universe has 
>> no center.
>>
> This is actually the reason, why 'big-bang-theory' must be wrong.
> 
> The big bang would be, in a way, the center of the universe and the 
> beginning of time.

You are again making up silly stuff. In the b-b-theory there is NO
center. The Big Band happened everywhere.

> [snip demented nonsense]