Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vbacln$3uuc5$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_A_Web_app_showing_Einstein-Poincar=C3=A9_Synchroniz?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?ation_procedure?=
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 21:33:11 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <vbacln$3uuc5$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vb9t4r$3smhq$2@dont-email.me>
 <17f217dd9c7a6b40$820525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vba2j7$3spoe$11@dont-email.me>
 <17f2190e7f05aadd$885437$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 21:33:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8d71566ceadf1b6fe05dd5e1564538d";
	logging-data="4159877"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ovxqUFRtWEOG3o6G0lYJL"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zQTVUj374J4rCdOBwEQTJ/Xi4pA=
In-Reply-To: <17f2190e7f05aadd$885437$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2386

Le 04/09/2024 à 18:59, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 18:41, Python pisze:
>> Le 04/09/2024 à 18:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 17:08, Python pisze:
>>>> Hi !
>>>>
>>>> I've written a Web app to show Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization
>>>> procedure in action :
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lest's all kneel before The Holiest Procedure!
>>> Apart of that it's pretty unusable for anything,
>>> after all.
>>
>> I'm not interested on *your* opinion on the *physical*
>> part as you stopped studying physics as soon as you
>> "discovered" that it is a religious ideological cult,
>> didn't you?
> 
> Come on, the mumble of your idiot guru was not
> even consistent, as it has been proven. Why
> would anybody sane study it knowing that?

Anybody that has been convinced by your alleged "proof",
I'd guess, definitely wouldn't.

Let me check numbers... Nobody. Zero. Nada.

>> I *may* be interested by your opinion on the *code* though :-)
> 
> Too bad I'm not interested in your code.

Well, I wasn't that interested anyway. But I would be quite interested
to read some of *your code* :-P