| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vbacln$3uuc5$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_A_Web_app_showing_Einstein-Poincar=C3=A9_Synchroniz?= =?UTF-8?Q?ation_procedure?= Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 21:33:11 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 38 Message-ID: <vbacln$3uuc5$2@dont-email.me> References: <vb9t4r$3smhq$2@dont-email.me> <17f217dd9c7a6b40$820525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <vba2j7$3spoe$11@dont-email.me> <17f2190e7f05aadd$885437$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 21:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8d71566ceadf1b6fe05dd5e1564538d"; logging-data="4159877"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ovxqUFRtWEOG3o6G0lYJL" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:zQTVUj374J4rCdOBwEQTJ/Xi4pA= In-Reply-To: <17f2190e7f05aadd$885437$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2386 Le 04/09/2024 à 18:59, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 04.09.2024 o 18:41, Python pisze: >> Le 04/09/2024 à 18:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 17:08, Python pisze: >>>> Hi ! >>>> >>>> I've written a Web app to show Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization >>>> procedure in action : >>>> >>> >>> >>> Lest's all kneel before The Holiest Procedure! >>> Apart of that it's pretty unusable for anything, >>> after all. >> >> I'm not interested on *your* opinion on the *physical* >> part as you stopped studying physics as soon as you >> "discovered" that it is a religious ideological cult, >> didn't you? > > Come on, the mumble of your idiot guru was not > even consistent, as it has been proven. Why > would anybody sane study it knowing that? Anybody that has been convinced by your alleged "proof", I'd guess, definitely wouldn't. Let me check numbers... Nobody. Zero. Nada. >> I *may* be interested by your opinion on the *code* though :-) > > Too bad I'm not interested in your code. Well, I wasn't that interested anyway. But I would be quite interested to read some of *your code* :-P