Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years.
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 22:37:45 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me>
References: <367a05faa8f01479dcdaf8830f10dcf7@www.novabbs.com>
 <e8b29c5101fbc103960fd726448cb9c5@www.novabbs.com>
 <14a2a927a6538adba1250e968096d842@www.novabbs.com>
 <CXFBO.21981$b6j.15432@fx11.ams4>
 <10fea9950896ac733f4c688b1322dcdb@www.novabbs.com>
 <vbadl3$3v15v$2@dont-email.me>
 <17f2245497b85697$828672$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 22:37:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8d71566ceadf1b6fe05dd5e1564538d";
	logging-data="4159877"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ryDlQKDsIo+/J4x2TBtMf"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qD+UVXfeoKyYIAeZElAoxRujH00=
In-Reply-To: <17f2245497b85697$828672$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2052

Le 04/09/2024 à 22:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 21:51, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
>> Den 03.09.2024 21:40, skrev rhertz:
>>> Finally, IF you are enlightened to see the truth 
>>
>> ...then look at the experimental evidence:
>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
> 
> See, trash: any idiot can point  anything
> and scream  that it is evidence.
> 

You know well, right Maciej?

Also do we.

This is why we have peer validation you know?

Peers from different times, cultures and countries. So
this likely exclude herd effect. Especially after such
a long time. But — you'll never know, right? Anyway...

Do you have any kind of peer validation for your "proof",
even from a SINGLE peer?