Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years.
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 22:59:36 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <vbahno$3uuc5$6@dont-email.me>
References: <367a05faa8f01479dcdaf8830f10dcf7@www.novabbs.com>
 <e8b29c5101fbc103960fd726448cb9c5@www.novabbs.com>
 <14a2a927a6538adba1250e968096d842@www.novabbs.com>
 <CXFBO.21981$b6j.15432@fx11.ams4>
 <10fea9950896ac733f4c688b1322dcdb@www.novabbs.com>
 <vbadl3$3v15v$2@dont-email.me>
 <17f2245497b85697$828672$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me>
 <17f225e000ca2067$792000$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vbahjb$3uuc5$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 22:59:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8d71566ceadf1b6fe05dd5e1564538d";
	logging-data="4159877"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/P+KC2BWNPdT1225CmcC5D"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zeGH/4MVtg8S32nzKs6nu+sJFaw=
In-Reply-To: <vbahjb$3uuc5$5@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2801

Le 04/09/2024 à 22:57, Python a écrit :
> Le 04/09/2024 à 22:54, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 22:37, Python pisze:
>>> Le 04/09/2024 à 22:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>> W dniu 04.09.2024 o 21:51, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
>>>>> Den 03.09.2024 21:40, skrev rhertz:
>>>>>> Finally, IF you are enlightened to see the truth 
>>>>>
>>>>> ...then look at the experimental evidence:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
>>>>
>>>> See, trash: any idiot can point  anything
>>>> and scream  that it is evidence.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You know well, right Maciej?
>>>
>>> Also do we.
>>>
>>> This is why we have peer validation you know?
>>>
>>> Peers from different times, cultures and countries. So
>>> this likely exclude herd effect.
>>
>>
>> Sorry, trash, the mumble of your idiot guru was
>> not even consistent - it has been proven. Herd
>> effect definitely.

Not necessarily, "I could have been argued on my space time".

Seriously you got "peers rebukes". Literally. This is a fact.

>>> Do you have any kind of peer validation for your "proof",
>>> even from a SINGLE peer?
>>
>> Why would I need it? 
> 
> Because ANY proof need peer review.
> 
> Including YOUR alleged proofs.
> 
> What would you make special? You are a son of God?

If so, I would LOVE to read the code you've produced :-D