| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vbcbe4$bdtb$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 08:24:20 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <vbcbe4$bdtb$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vb4plc$2tqeg$1@dont-email.me> <vb6o5t$3a95s$1@dont-email.me>
<vb71a3$3b4ub$4@dont-email.me> <vbbmuc$8nbb$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 15:24:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="43b31a63184850aec0f50fc55161dc88";
logging-data="374699"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Y+Fz/4GRjUyK1dRfhGL1I"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aSvzZW+EwdXi3c+AxoyzRRyFa6E=
In-Reply-To: <vbbmuc$8nbb$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3638
On 9/5/2024 2:34 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-09-03 13:00:50 +0000, olcott said:
>
>> On 9/3/2024 5:25 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-02 16:38:03 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> A halt decider is a Turing machine that computes
>>>> the mapping from its finite string input to the
>>>> behavior that this finite string specifies.
>>>
>>> A halt decider needn't compute the full behaviour, only whether
>>> that behaviour is finite or infinite.
>>>
>>
>> void DDD()
>> {
>> HHH(DDD);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> New slave_stack at:1038c4
>> Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:1138cc
>> [00002172][001138bc][001138c0] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
>> [00002173][001138bc][001138c0] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
>> [00002175][001138b8][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>> [0000217a][001138b4][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>> New slave_stack at:14e2ec
>> [00002172][0015e2e4][0015e2e8] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
>> [00002173][0015e2e4][0015e2e8] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
>> [00002175][0015e2e0][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>> [0000217a][0015e2dc][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>> Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped
>>
>> Hence HHH(DDD)==0 is correct
>
> Nice to see that you don't disagree with what said.
> Unvortunately I can't agree with what you say.
> HHH terminates,
> os DDD obviously terminates, too. No valid
DDD emulated by HHH never reaches it final halt state.
It looks like I have to repeat this 10,000 times before
anyone ever notices that I said it at least once.
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
Show the details of how DDD emulated by HHH
reaches its own machine address 0000217f.
00002172, 00002173, 00002175, 0000217a calls HHH(DDD)
then
00002172, 00002173, 00002175, 0000217a calls HHH(DDD)...
> C interpretaion of allows DDD to continue forever after
> HHH jas terminated.
>
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer