Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vbcge6$cd1g$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 14:49:42 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <vbcge6$cd1g$2@dont-email.me>
References: <2024Aug30.161204@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <memo.20240830164247.19028y@jgd.cix.co.uk> <vasruo$id3b$1@dont-email.me>
 <2024Aug30.195831@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vat5ap$jthk$2@dont-email.me>
 <vaunhb$vckc$1@dont-email.me> <vautmu$vr5r$1@dont-email.me>
 <2024Aug31.170347@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <vavpnh$13tj0$2@dont-email.me> <vb2hir$1ju7q$1@dont-email.me>
 <jwv34mgo7sz.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>
 <2024Sep5.151959@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 16:49:42 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="49b1fef9f6d2c4ff10ee0b8b71cf8125";
	logging-data="406576"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+rRDEHgwBSTXEQneE5NxBoIog0zFK++vM="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ev7+daJOCoNYljFYcxzh+IcRCws=
Bytes: 1806

Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> schrieb:

> In either case, treating the C standard as agreement is nonsense.

That's a good summary of your attitude.  Using this argument with
compiler writers will get you precisely nowhere, but you already
have experience with that.

Now for a challenge:  Try to specify the behavior of any piece of
undefined behavior whose treatment by compilers you object to in
a way that a compiler writer can follow it.  Think that it could
be published as an annex to the standard.

What could this be?