Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vbcs65$egrs$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 13:10:13 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 40 Message-ID: <vbcs65$egrs$1@dont-email.me> References: <vb4plc$2tqeg$1@dont-email.me> <vb6o5t$3a95s$1@dont-email.me> <vb71a3$3b4ub$4@dont-email.me> <vbbmuc$8nbb$1@dont-email.me> <vbcbe4$bdtb$3@dont-email.me> <cb6a625f1737dafed130e2bdad14395d95566ba1@i2pn2.org> <vbcl61$d8p0$1@dont-email.me> <e097e72a4319eb72e8663d055aa54d69af610831@i2pn2.org> <vbcnjk$dr54$1@dont-email.me> <5d7b0659450f58aec28d4f49b1b59982cedfc694@i2pn2.org> <vbcp2d$e330$1@dont-email.me> <70a0b7e4bd0a0129649d8e77cdc36339bd74d6a5@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 20:10:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="43b31a63184850aec0f50fc55161dc88"; logging-data="476028"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/VLF3owrh1k3ghSNhlqNVg" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:2NXMWxujvXDBvZfDuX4q9f4Trgs= In-Reply-To: <70a0b7e4bd0a0129649d8e77cdc36339bd74d6a5@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3158 On 9/5/2024 12:22 PM, joes wrote: > Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 12:17:01 -0500 schrieb olcott: >> On 9/5/2024 11:56 AM, joes wrote: >>> Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:52:04 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>>> On 9/5/2024 11:34 AM, joes wrote: >>>>> Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:10:40 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>>>>> On 9/5/2024 10:57 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>>> Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 08:24:20 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>> On 9/5/2024 2:34 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-03 13:00:50 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>>>>>> On 9/3/2024 5:25 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-02 16:38:03 +0000, olcott said: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Show the details of how DDD emulated by HHH reaches its own >>>>>>>> machine address 0000217f. >>>>>>> By HHH returning, which we are guaranteed from its definition as a >>>>>>> decider. >>>>>> How the F--- Does the emulated HHH return? >>>>> I don’t know, you claim it’s a decider! > >>>> DDD emulated by HHH CANNOT POSSIBLY reach its own machine address >>>> 0000217f. >>> Only HHH can’t simulate it. >>> >>>> The directly executed HHH correctly determines that its emulated DDD >>>> must be aborted because DDD keeps *THE EMULATED HHH* stuck in >>>> recursive emulation. >>> Why doesn’t the simulated HHH abort? >> The first HHH cannot wait for its HHH to abort which is waiting for its >> HHH to abort on and on with no HHH ever aborting. > But why does HHH halt and return that itself doesn’t halt? > First agree that you understand the first part so that we don't endlessly digress away from the point. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer