Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vbd53f$famd$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years.
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 22:43:46 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <vbd53f$famd$2@dont-email.me>
References: <367a05faa8f01479dcdaf8830f10dcf7@www.novabbs.com>
 <e8b29c5101fbc103960fd726448cb9c5@www.novabbs.com>
 <14a2a927a6538adba1250e968096d842@www.novabbs.com>
 <CXFBO.21981$b6j.15432@fx11.ams4>
 <10fea9950896ac733f4c688b1322dcdb@www.novabbs.com>
 <vbadl3$3v15v$2@dont-email.me>
 <17f2245497b85697$828672$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me>
 <4b0ee2b8b33c7f434476e1149c48ed3f@www.novabbs.com>
 <vbc8vg$b7vf$1@dont-email.me>
 <20f177818d9a30f262693d59594796b3@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 22:42:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b4a36dbefc7e4a8f358230e5838ec27f";
	logging-data="502477"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19GCRx8C+RFnrnBay0LIJvE"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VBUH3AQNpZQSgzU5pMuGE8kvkbA=
In-Reply-To: <20f177818d9a30f262693d59594796b3@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2236

Den 05.09.2024 22:02, skrev rhertz:
> Paul wrote:
>> 
>> Richard Hertz, I have one simple question for you:
>> 
>> Why is it that SR and GR are tested by a vast number of experiments
>> and are never falsified?
>> 
>> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
> 
> 1) Most of the "experimental proofs" that you so proudly list are
> doctored, hacked by using fraudulent cherry-picking of data or just
> invented. The relativity community support these procedures, so they can
> keep milking the funds that "people with an agenda" provides, either
> from the state or the corrupt academia.

So what is most probable:
1. Richard Hertz is wrong.
2. All physicist since 1905 are frauds.


  --
Paul

https://paulba.no/