| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vbd53f$famd$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years. Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 22:43:46 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <vbd53f$famd$2@dont-email.me> References: <367a05faa8f01479dcdaf8830f10dcf7@www.novabbs.com> <e8b29c5101fbc103960fd726448cb9c5@www.novabbs.com> <14a2a927a6538adba1250e968096d842@www.novabbs.com> <CXFBO.21981$b6j.15432@fx11.ams4> <10fea9950896ac733f4c688b1322dcdb@www.novabbs.com> <vbadl3$3v15v$2@dont-email.me> <17f2245497b85697$828672$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me> <4b0ee2b8b33c7f434476e1149c48ed3f@www.novabbs.com> <vbc8vg$b7vf$1@dont-email.me> <20f177818d9a30f262693d59594796b3@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 22:42:23 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b4a36dbefc7e4a8f358230e5838ec27f"; logging-data="502477"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19GCRx8C+RFnrnBay0LIJvE" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:VBUH3AQNpZQSgzU5pMuGE8kvkbA= In-Reply-To: <20f177818d9a30f262693d59594796b3@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2236 Den 05.09.2024 22:02, skrev rhertz: > Paul wrote: >> >> Richard Hertz, I have one simple question for you: >> >> Why is it that SR and GR are tested by a vast number of experiments >> and are never falsified? >> >> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html > > 1) Most of the "experimental proofs" that you so proudly list are > doctored, hacked by using fraudulent cherry-picking of data or just > invented. The relativity community support these procedures, so they can > keep milking the funds that "people with an agenda" provides, either > from the state or the corrupt academia. So what is most probable: 1. Richard Hertz is wrong. 2. All physicist since 1905 are frauds. -- Paul https://paulba.no/