Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vbfo8i$uivu$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vbfo8i$uivu$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 13:21:38 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <vbfo8i$uivu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vb2t56$1ljuq$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 22:21:38 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4153c92d506f1932ef361f98492f73e1";
	logging-data="1002494"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1994oSjj37Bg+vw887Am+P7wdms36B+DNo="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hsnjtUXASK7IO6TuEhzsbh6eua8=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <vb2t56$1ljuq$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2372

On 2024-09-01 16:25, -hh wrote:
> Looking at replacing an old Canon 'CanoScan LiDE 110' that seems to be 
> fading away (bulb's going yellow).
> 
> Its USB connected; I use it quite a bit w/MacOS's "Image Capture" app, 
> and documents to PDF.
> 
> Looking around at equivalents, I think I've narrowed it down to two:
> 
> * Canon CanoScan LiDE 400
> 
> * Epson Perfection V39 II
> 
> It looks like both are currently supported in MacOS Sonoma 14.x
> 
> Any particular plus/minus or other observations?  Cost difference is 
> negligible ($80 vs $90).
> 
> A couple of things that I've found:
> 
> * Epson is USB-2 (disappointing) & has separate power supply
> * Canon claims USB-C but not which flavor/version thereof.
> 
> * Documentation isn't clear if the Epson supports scan-to-PDF.
> 
> 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> -hh

I did a little more digging for you, and I'm leaning towards the Canon 
because while both can scan PDFs from buttons on the front, the Canon 
seems to have better support for multi-page PDFs.

You click to start a PDF scan, and then you can keep adding pages until 
you click the "Stop" button.

PCMag seems to rate them both nearly the same (although the Epson was 
the one they recommended in their composite "Best scanners of 2024), but 
if you are planning to scan longer documents, it might make a simpler 
workflow.