Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions?
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 22:42:14 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <vbfpf5$utdu$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org>
 <0da78c91e9bc2e4dc5de13bd16e4037ceb8bdfd4@i2pn2.org>
 <vb57lf$2vud1$1@dont-email.me> <5d8b4ac0-3060-40df-8534-3e04bb77c12d@att.net>
 <vb6o0r$3a4m1$2@dont-email.me> <7e1e3f62-1fba-4484-8e34-6ff8f1e54625@att.net>
 <vbabbm$24a94$1@solani.org> <06ee7920-eff2-4687-be98-67a89b301c93@att.net>
 <38ypmjbnu3EfnKYR4tSIu-WavbA@jntp>
 <34e11216-439f-4b11-bdff-1a252ac98f8f@att.net> <vbd56i$fqa0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vbdbq3$gdoe$2@dont-email.me> <vbes57$qdqo$2@dont-email.me>
 <27b3b5e088d82d4475c68a64f50a4bccac9c6f29@i2pn2.org>
 <vbesjo$27gfe$1@solani.org> <vbf0s9$qp1j$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 22:42:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="37eea6df7cd50e75c32a35553828111c";
	logging-data="1013182"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+MUyNHq7qf7p7YVSXBT2u2eYlIJ+IVcM0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QwUsLn+i3ohfxI7V5IJI8nnPIVc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vbf0s9$qp1j$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2270

On 06.09.2024 15:42, Python wrote:
> Le 06/09/2024 à 14:29, Crank Wolfgang Mückenheim, aka WM a écrit :
>> On 06.09.2024 14:26, joes wrote:
>>> Am Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:22:00 +0200 schrieb WM:
>>
>>>> Example: The function f(x) = [x] increases at every x ∈ ℕ by 1.
>>>> The function NUF(x) increases at every x = unit fraction 1/n by 1. It
>>>> does not increase at 0 because 0 is not a unit fraction.
>>> What exactly happens at those points?
>>
>> The simplest action possible in mathematics: f --> f + 1
> 
> What you wrote above is a function associating a function to a function.

No it is a value changing to this value + 1.

Regards, WM