Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_A_Web_app_showing_Einstein-Poincar=C3=A9_Synchroniz?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?ation_procedure?=
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 03:09:32 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vbitgc$1k0ij$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vb9t4r$3smhq$2@dont-email.me>
 <17f217dd9c7a6b40$820525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vba2j7$3spoe$11@dont-email.me>
 <dbc1a9e6296f37e29f3494fc81a602a1@www.novabbs.com>
 <vbhjs3$1cg6l$1@dont-email.me>
 <fd4e3eb680f11e7b5abb2f69b0e8feff@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2024 03:09:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="819bf80071f695903b06caff553dc477";
	logging-data="1704531"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2d1ur5ga9Vuy+1E99eNed"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Mo4Cra8vhsD4l4p1Z+mN/BwkT+Y=
In-Reply-To: <fd4e3eb680f11e7b5abb2f69b0e8feff@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2474

Le 07/09/2024 à 19:08, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog a écrit :
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2024 13:18:59 +0000, Python wrote:
> 
>> I would definitely suggest Brython instead of JS :-) And definitely
>> Python instead of C# :-))
> 
> Let's not get into language wars here! Python, for all its renown
> as a language great for rapid prototyping, is SLOW. And I would not
> use it in large projects. Dynamic typing seems convenient at first,
> but it can be an albatross around your neck if you are coding a
> complex application.

Of course no war :-) I'm just saying how *I* would do it.

> Of course, there is Mypy.

And Pypy, Cython, and a brain :

https://framagit.org/jpython/sieve_profile

> I would not use python for CPU intensive computations like the
> following computation of the Newtonian contribution to Mercury's
> precession:
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8XIf0XcrpOcV1RwMk9QNzBzVU0?resourcekey=0-5EfA3Gf3b5Ha8i2TANPcHQ

..... ?

> (I believe that Paul Anderson published a similar graph that
> was more accurate than mine because he did not use the
> simplification of coplanar orbits. My figures are a bit high.)