| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vbk7dp$1u949$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: undroidwish <undroidwish@googlemail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl Subject: Re: Nice example about the "inefficiently" of the tcl "c" api. Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 15:04:56 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: <vbk7dp$1u949$1@dont-email.me> References: <v9ggb7$2dcu$1@dont-email.me> <vbfp4d$utpf$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2024 15:04:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a9c496571cf78af8f41c5880cdfd7ce3"; logging-data="2040969"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18jBZqheU6Yna+qdf3A4JWojSZxXs069Wo=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:XLbqd4mRdpY6d4HX7bKRB7n+kTs= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vbfp4d$utpf$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 1481 On 9/6/24 22:36, aotto1968 wrote: > Down is the "C" code of the C-Function to test the an "object" to be valid. > ... Hmm, to judge the "efficiently" of the tcl "c" api is between difficult and impossible due to your "cryptically" "c" code snippets. In other words, more context would be of tremendous help. So where is the beef? Or ham, or even spam?