Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: aotto1968 <aotto1968@t-online.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl
Subject: Re: Nice example about the "inefficiently" of the tcl "c" api.
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:09:12 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <vbmaf8$2b9tt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v9ggb7$2dcu$1@dont-email.me> <vbfp4d$utpf$1@dont-email.me>
 <vbk7dp$1u949$1@dont-email.me> <WBhDO.40879$g_vf.9825@fx03.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 10:09:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fb882121e9a8679b7ed7c229a0766461";
	logging-data="2467773"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lM1dgnMJCQLy3X/2ik2pdu/pqsOBtboM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rzLb0Ic/H5W6G3z3gwwRDYcji0s=
In-Reply-To: <WBhDO.40879$g_vf.9825@fx03.iad>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2527

On 08.09.24 15:26, Gerald Lester wrote:
> On 9/8/24 08:04, undroidwish wrote:
>> On 9/6/24 22:36, aotto1968 wrote:
>>
>>> Down is the "C" code of the C-Function to test the an "object" to be valid.
>>> ...
>>
>> Hmm, to judge the "efficiently" of the tcl "c" api is between difficult
>> and impossible due to your "cryptically" "c" code snippets. In other
>> words, more context would be of tremendous help. So where is the beef?
>> Or ham, or even spam?
> 
> Others, including myself, have asked him for the Tcl and Python code he is using to get his measurements -- he has consistently 
> refused to supply the code.
> 
> Long and short, to me this is just spam.

I understand that the "missing-code" thing is just a kind of "self-protection" issue

→ If you make an performance check between TCL and JAVA you don't start with "analyze the JAVA kernel" etc
→ If I post a result this is the the result *AFTER* all known optimization was applied etc
→ If I write that TCL is ~30% slower as PY than it is so.
→ Even if I would send you the PLMK-kernel-code you probably will never understand this but this is no problem
   because you also drive a car without "understand" the internals of a car and if I say that PORSCHE
   is fasten than "VAUXHALL" than nobody will say:
   -> "I don't accept this until I have checked the VAUXHALL design specs".