Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: From the Archives.....
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 20:26:51 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <vbmihb$2cha8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vb70tg$3bdsb$1@dont-email.me> <vbjub8$1t1j5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vbk1va$ies$6@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vbk494$1trc0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vbk4so$npd$4@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vbk59c$1tv92$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 12:26:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e4c35ce595886af68ba54203b6aa8c40";
	logging-data="2508104"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX194IIzKYn4P9Rd+maUj0CYyf+98Mo3WdEw="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ygGtOYV5/tSVrZR2YYo5uj1C+ng=
In-Reply-To: <vbk59c$1tv92$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2720

solar penguin wrote on 8/9/24 10:28 pm:
> The ignored another inquiry:
>> In article <vbk494$1trc0$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The idiot instructed me:
>>>> In article <vbjub8$1t1j5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The idiot ignored my inquiry:
>>>>>> In article <vbhvg8$1egnp$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> The idiot insisted:
>>>>>>>> In article <vbhpb9$1djpi$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You couldn’t foll him if your life depended on it!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Depends birdie!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Depends on _what_?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Idlehands is most deceived poster on Usenet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> % has 100x more intelligence than Idlehands.
>>>>>
>>>>> That doesn’t answer my question. What does your ability to
>>>>> ‘foll’ people depend on?
>>>>
>>>> Please read again Birdie.
>>>
>>> OK.
>>>
>>> (*reads again*)
>>>
>>> No, it still doesn’t answer my question.
>>>
>>> Start at the beginning. One step at a time. Describe how you
>>> would foll someone, then go on to explain all the things it
>>> depends on.
>>>
>>> Does that make it easier for you?
>>
>> Already done above.
> 
> Liar! Nowhere above do you describe folling, one step at a time!
> 
I'm with you, Solar Penguin. NOWHERE has Gobble-de-gook bothered to 
explain what HE thinks HE means by HIS use of the word 'foll'!!
-- 
Daniel