Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vbn3uc$2f3p9$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: <bp@www.zefox.net>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 15:23:56 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vbn3uc$2f3p9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v9g9tq$14v2$1@dont-email.me> <wwvfrr72n8d.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <v9lbmq$115gc$1@dont-email.me> <vatpki$n4it$1@dont-email.me> <vb092o$162j5$9@dont-email.me> <vb0dcd$17650$2@dont-email.me> <vb164i$1dlt4$11@dont-email.me> <vb24nq$1huca$2@dont-email.me> <wwvfrqjns88.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vb2r25$1lgo8$1@dont-email.me> <vb3cbc$1r1t9$8@dont-email.me> <vbgark$10tpi$1@dont-email.me> <vbis6i$1kbvu$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 17:23:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5d5bfbef785a2104cd43d83fb7d346e7";
	logging-data="2592553"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197Og8qE4UT3i++ge6s/vhbFHTVx3krpag="
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (FreeBSD/14.0-RELEASE-p9 (arm64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pN5cxo6NqzQtJAwIadgzsfIpzCo=
Bytes: 2213

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2024 01:39:00 -0000 (UTC), bp wrote:
> 
>> Your scripts seem to work on both FreeBSD and RasPiOS. Now to see if I
>> can stumble through making them work between _between_ FreeBSD and
>> RasPiOS.
> 
> Hey, great.
> 
>> One obvious question is setting the "listen_addr" in the
>> try_server script. Can it be set to "any" or a range by IP or FQEN?
> 
> That has to be a valid interface address, or just make it “0.0.0.0” to 
> listen on all interfaces on the local machine. This makes it visible 
> across your network, with the consequent security implications, which is 
> why I used “127.0.0.1” (loopback interface, only visible on the local 
> machine) in the published code.

Ok, that'll work fine.

Thanks for all your help!

bob prohaska