Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vbn9br$2fu5n$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: BOLO pervert cyclist Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 11:56:27 -0500 Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd. Lines: 74 Message-ID: <vbn9br$2fu5n$1@dont-email.me> References: <vbf1g1$r1ti$1@dont-email.me> <v26ndj5b4038brf60dhms4jqluln99fcq0@4ax.com> <vbga1p$10phu$6@dont-email.me> <3d4odj5e1mecoos0bs9h9uslqcpaa2ojtu@4ax.com> <vbhq5n$1dkbr$2@dont-email.me> <jlsodj1m76ftt2sjj8c1puv1eje5ajbgbe@4ax.com> <vbk5ej$1t9n4$4@dont-email.me> <2n9rdj9lb9mc2qlir5e658h1972nf7bmo4@4ax.com> <vbla24$23i7l$2@dont-email.me> <1vesdjh23eqk9cml7f0nd8lsi4s2v06lht@4ax.com> <vblj1a$24hqc$5@dont-email.me> <d2vsdjpl7ftt50t5appdnao3ervfnpp6ob@4ax.com> <vbmvcf$2e5f6$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 18:56:27 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="85418f4a36d432bbb24b8818bf5dc2dc"; logging-data="2619575"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+4JsM/FAm1U8oye01snpx7" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:poEe1a+cRvWmBSEowsT7P6TR17c= In-Reply-To: <vbmvcf$2e5f6$5@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3962 On 9/9/2024 9:06 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote: > On 9/9/2024 1:38 AM, John B. wrote: >> On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 21:29:14 -0400, Frank Krygowski >> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >>> On 9/8/2024 8:16 PM, John B. wrote: >>>> On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 18:56:02 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 9/8/2024 9:37 AM, John B. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You rant about the AR's but not a peep about the drunks. >>>>> >>>>> Part of the difference is that we don't have posters >>>>> here regularly >>>>> praising drunk driving. We do have about three posters >>>>> regularly >>>>> praising the public use of ARs, and the great value of >>>>> owning one. >>>>> >>>>> Even though two of those posters don't themselves own one! >>>> >>>> More lies. >>>> >>>> I believe that myself and Andrew are the two main people >>>> that talk >>>> about the dreaded AR's but I don't remember any one >>>> "praise" them... >>> >>> Oh. I thought you were in favor of them. That would seem >>> to imply you >>> think they have good qualities. >> >> I don't believe I ever implied that I was in favor of AR >> types, but I >> would add that neither do I oppose them. Nor ever voiced >> such a >> belief, or (again from memory) do I remember Andrew doing >> so although >> I do remember his showing a picture of his wife/ >> girlfriend's AR. >> >> But I must admit that your stated belief that it is >> perfectly normal, >> and you apparently condone, drunk drivers and other law >> breakers >> killing kill kids with automobiles while killing a far >> smaller number >> with an AR is terrible, terrible. >> >> It seems, at best irrational, to say the least. > > Nope, you're losing track of the logic again. > > Many years ago, we had one poster here who bragged about his > chaotic bicycling behavior, including riding while very > drunk. He's long gone. But even he did not post in favor of > drunk driving. If someone did, I'd argue against them. > > We do have people posting in favor of essentially > unrestricted public possession of rifles capable of rapidly > killing dozens of people. I argue against them, because I > see the societal disadvantages greatly exceeding the > (nonexistent!) societal advantages. > Nice summary of your oft-expressed views. Others do not see the issues similarly. -- Andrew Muzi am@yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971