Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: BOLO pervert cyclist
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:11:21 -0500
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vbna7o$2fu5n$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vbf1g1$r1ti$1@dont-email.me>
 <v26ndj5b4038brf60dhms4jqluln99fcq0@4ax.com> <vbga1p$10phu$6@dont-email.me>
 <5sindjpqbq0lks6kn3but34lsisqsf0ooo@4ax.com> <vbhq2m$1dkbr$1@dont-email.me>
 <nprodj1a2j64r86l99qcsb1pr0tr92bing@4ax.com>
 <h1updjt2ks04gboo1829o4vhb5tt91rbgf@4ax.com> <vbj3nr$1pico$3@dont-email.me>
 <vbkf7s$1v0hh$8@dont-email.me> <vbksu1$216mu$1@dont-email.me>
 <s66sdjhbqs88k35pcr7a0obmruohoeq2ut@4ax.com>
 <9iqsdjh1d929ane5u7jfo4j7bbvj2jkjjd@4ax.com> <vbmuev$2e5f6$3@dont-email.me>
 <vbmuve$2e82c$1@dont-email.me> <vbn0hd$2e5f6$9@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 19:11:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="85418f4a36d432bbb24b8818bf5dc2dc";
	logging-data="2619575"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Cv5QOr80/ssMjfNobzAeU"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sFSvlnP4KhoH90oRxJ2t1FgJAZc=
In-Reply-To: <vbn0hd$2e5f6$9@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3371

On 9/9/2024 9:25 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
> On 9/9/2024 9:59 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>> On 9/9/2024 8:50 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>>> On 9/9/2024 12:38 AM, John B. wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 08 Sep 2024 18:01:10 -0400, Catrike Ryder
>>>> <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 15:12:00 -0400, Frank Krygowski
>>>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/8/2024 11:18 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/7/2024 9:55 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You've made such statments dozens of times - 
>>>>>>>> effectively saying "but
>>>>>>>> cars kill more people and we don't ban cars."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've rebutted that over and over, pointing out that 
>>>>>>>> the benefits of
>>>>>>>> cars outweigh the detriments - something not true of 
>>>>>>>> the type of
>>>>>>>> firearm you passionately worship. (Despite not 
>>>>>>>> owning an example!)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And society certainly does _try_ to curtail drunk 
>>>>>>>> driving and
>>>>>>>> speeding. But gun worshipers rail against any 
>>>>>>>> attempt to restrict use
>>>>>>>> of guns.
>>>>
>>>> Good old Frankie... there have been restrictive gun laws 
>>>> since the
>>>> 1930's.
>>>
>>> Longer than that, John. I did not say there were not. I 
>>> said gun worshipers rail against any and all such laws.
>>
>> Equally to restrictions on our 1st Amendment liberties.
>>
> 
> There's one now. Every one of our "liberties" comes with 
> reasonable restrictions, many of which have been signed into 
> law and upheld by courts. Gun "liberties" are no more 
> sacrosanct.
> 

No liberties are sacrosanct now.  How about the 'hate 
speech' invention to stifle dissent? That's more offensive 
than their targets.

-- 
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971