Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 13:19:26 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <vbne7e$2g6vo$6@dont-email.me>
References: <vb4plc$2tqeg$1@dont-email.me> <vb6o5t$3a95s$1@dont-email.me>
 <vb71a3$3b4ub$4@dont-email.me> <vbbmuc$8nbb$1@dont-email.me>
 <vbcbe4$bdtb$3@dont-email.me> <vbeoge$q2ph$1@dont-email.me>
 <vbeprp$punj$7@dont-email.me>
 <c600a691fab10473128eed2a1fad2a429ad4733f@i2pn2.org>
 <vbh2sp$19ov0$1@dont-email.me> <vbhm3c$1c7u5$12@dont-email.me>
 <vbkdph$1v80k$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 20:19:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce886c54a33fbb99da3cdb312c5f423c";
	logging-data="2628600"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+EM0jFEJBWS7tEjqyCeymm"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yfRKqQC9YP2qPlXrDmsZ6zR1WrY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vbkdph$1v80k$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3984

On 9/8/2024 9:53 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-09-07 13:57:00 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 9/7/2024 3:29 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-07 05:12:19 +0000, joes said:
>>>
>>>> Am Fri, 06 Sep 2024 06:42:48 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 9/6/2024 6:19 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-09-05 13:24:20 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>> On 9/5/2024 2:34 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-03 13:00:50 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/3/2024 5:25 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-02 16:38:03 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A halt decider is a Turing machine that computes the mapping 
>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> its finite string input to the behavior that this finite string
>>>>>>>>>>> specifies.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A halt decider needn't compute the full behaviour, only whether
>>>>>>>>>> that behaviour is finite or infinite.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> New slave_stack at:1038c4 Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hence  HHH(DDD)==0 is correct
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nice to see that you don't disagree with what said.
>>>>>>>> Unvortunately I can't agree with what you say.
>>>>>>>> HHH terminates,
>>>>>>>> os DDD obviously terminates, too. No valid
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DDD emulated by HHH never reaches it final halt state.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If that iis true it means that HHH called by DDD does not return and
>>>>>> therefore is not a ceicder.
>>>>> The directly executed HHH is a decider.
>>>> What does simulating it change about that?
>>>
>>> If the simulation is incorrect it may change anything.
>>>
>> PATHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE BEHAVIOR
>> PATHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE BEHAVIOR
>> PATHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE BEHAVIOR
>> PATHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE BEHAVIOR
>> PATHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE BEHAVIOR
> 
> However, a correct simultation faithfully imitates the original
> behaviour.
> 

_DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d         pop ebp
[00002183] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]

A correct emulation obeys the x86 machine code even
if this machine code catches the machine on fire.

It is impossible for an emulation of DDD by HHH to
reach machine address 00002183 AND YOU KNOW IT!!!

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer